Abstract B21: Community health worker led smoking cessation intervention in Virginia Appalachia

Lindsay Hauser, Catherine Labgold, Roger T Anderson, F. Camacho
{"title":"Abstract B21: Community health worker led smoking cessation intervention in Virginia Appalachia","authors":"Lindsay Hauser, Catherine Labgold, Roger T Anderson, F. Camacho","doi":"10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Smoking in the United States has steadily declined over the past several years; however, rural Virginia Appalachian communities have a substantially higher than average smoking prevalence than the rest of the country. A major challenge in providing effective and sustainable cigarette-cessation services to Virginia Appalachia is the geographic and economic diversity of the region, combined with much of the population residing in poor, medically underserved rural areas. Previous research has suggested that community health workers (CHWs) may be valuable in regions with limited financial and medical resources by acting as a bridge between patients and providers when access is limited by distance, health care provider shortages, and cultural stigma. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and success of using CHWs for smoking-cessation services in two Virginia Appalachian health care settings. Methods: Study enrollees were recruited from two sites: a local-family-owned pharmacy and a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in the Appalachian region of Virginia. Inclusion criteria were daily adult smokers (18+) who were patients at the clinic or the community pharmacy, and self-identified as ready to quit in the next 30 days. Enrollees were defined as individuals for whom a consent form and baseline assessment were completed. Enrollees were subset into a participant group defined as enrollees who completed at least the first session of the eight-session intervention plan. We used an intention-to-treat framework in calculating enrollee and participant quit rates. The program was designed to have eight sessions, with scheduling at the discretion of the CHW and participant. Sessions five and eight were to be completed by the respective health care provider for the clinic and pharmacy. Sessions one and two were completed by the CHW in person with the participant, and sessions three, four, six, and seven were completed by the CHW over the phone. During the sessions, CHWs helped participants develop skills in identifying and addressing barriers to a successful cigarette quit, providing support in adhering to their quit plan, and discussing challenges and barriers they were facing in their quit attempt. Results: Twenty-three individuals were enrolled in the study, with twenty distinguished as participants. The enrollee quit rate was 22%, with a participant quit rate of 25%. Overall, we found a statistically significant decrease in all participants9 average cigarettes smoked per day over the eight sessions. Almost all participants failed to complete sessions 5 and 8 with their health care provider. All participants highly rated the program with 100% satisfaction on flexibility of scheduling, level of comfort, positivity, and helpfulness of the CHW. Conclusion: The use of CHWs in Virginia Appalachian communities within our pilot study for cigarette cessation services appears promising. Challenges were noted in attendance to sessions five and eight in the clinic setting. This may speak to the difficulty of going back to their care provider due to challenges in scheduling, concerns about cost of visit, and transportation. The flexibility of working with CHWs, in their own community, over meeting with care providers may provide a benefit to the use of CHWs in future smoking-cessation programs. Future research should explore expanded integration of CHWs into comprehensive tobacco-cessation services in health care settings including the cost-benefit analysis and sustainability of the CHW model. Citation Format: Lindsay Hauser, Catherine Labgold, Roger Anderson, Fabian Camacho. Community health worker led smoking cessation intervention in Virginia Appalachia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B21.","PeriodicalId":254061,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and Social Science","volume":"312 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7755.DISP17-B21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Smoking in the United States has steadily declined over the past several years; however, rural Virginia Appalachian communities have a substantially higher than average smoking prevalence than the rest of the country. A major challenge in providing effective and sustainable cigarette-cessation services to Virginia Appalachia is the geographic and economic diversity of the region, combined with much of the population residing in poor, medically underserved rural areas. Previous research has suggested that community health workers (CHWs) may be valuable in regions with limited financial and medical resources by acting as a bridge between patients and providers when access is limited by distance, health care provider shortages, and cultural stigma. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and success of using CHWs for smoking-cessation services in two Virginia Appalachian health care settings. Methods: Study enrollees were recruited from two sites: a local-family-owned pharmacy and a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in the Appalachian region of Virginia. Inclusion criteria were daily adult smokers (18+) who were patients at the clinic or the community pharmacy, and self-identified as ready to quit in the next 30 days. Enrollees were defined as individuals for whom a consent form and baseline assessment were completed. Enrollees were subset into a participant group defined as enrollees who completed at least the first session of the eight-session intervention plan. We used an intention-to-treat framework in calculating enrollee and participant quit rates. The program was designed to have eight sessions, with scheduling at the discretion of the CHW and participant. Sessions five and eight were to be completed by the respective health care provider for the clinic and pharmacy. Sessions one and two were completed by the CHW in person with the participant, and sessions three, four, six, and seven were completed by the CHW over the phone. During the sessions, CHWs helped participants develop skills in identifying and addressing barriers to a successful cigarette quit, providing support in adhering to their quit plan, and discussing challenges and barriers they were facing in their quit attempt. Results: Twenty-three individuals were enrolled in the study, with twenty distinguished as participants. The enrollee quit rate was 22%, with a participant quit rate of 25%. Overall, we found a statistically significant decrease in all participants9 average cigarettes smoked per day over the eight sessions. Almost all participants failed to complete sessions 5 and 8 with their health care provider. All participants highly rated the program with 100% satisfaction on flexibility of scheduling, level of comfort, positivity, and helpfulness of the CHW. Conclusion: The use of CHWs in Virginia Appalachian communities within our pilot study for cigarette cessation services appears promising. Challenges were noted in attendance to sessions five and eight in the clinic setting. This may speak to the difficulty of going back to their care provider due to challenges in scheduling, concerns about cost of visit, and transportation. The flexibility of working with CHWs, in their own community, over meeting with care providers may provide a benefit to the use of CHWs in future smoking-cessation programs. Future research should explore expanded integration of CHWs into comprehensive tobacco-cessation services in health care settings including the cost-benefit analysis and sustainability of the CHW model. Citation Format: Lindsay Hauser, Catherine Labgold, Roger Anderson, Fabian Camacho. Community health worker led smoking cessation intervention in Virginia Appalachia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr B21.
摘要B21:社区卫生工作者主导了弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区的戒烟干预
在过去的几年里,美国的吸烟率稳步下降;然而,弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚农村社区的吸烟率远远高于全国其他地区的平均吸烟率。向弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区提供有效和可持续的戒烟服务的一个主要挑战是该区域的地理和经济多样性,以及许多人口居住在贫穷、医疗服务不足的农村地区。以前的研究表明,在财政和医疗资源有限的地区,社区卫生工作者(CHWs)可能是有价值的,因为在距离、卫生保健提供者短缺和文化耻辱感的限制下,社区卫生工作者(CHWs)可以作为患者和提供者之间的桥梁。本研究的目的是评估在弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区的两家卫生保健机构中,使用CHWs进行戒烟服务的可行性和成功性。方法:研究入组者从两个地点招募:弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区的一家当地家庭拥有的药房和一家联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)。纳入标准为每日在诊所或社区药房就诊的成年吸烟者(18岁以上),并自我确认准备在未来30天内戒烟。受试者定义为已完成同意书和基线评估的个体。参与者被划分为至少完成了八期干预计划第一期的参与者。我们使用意向治疗框架来计算入组者和参与者的戒烟率。该计划被设计为有八个环节,日程安排由CHW和参与者自行决定。第五次和第八次会议将由诊所和药房各自的保健提供者完成。第一和第二阶段由CHW亲自与参与者一起完成,第三、四、六和七阶段由CHW通过电话完成。在课程中,中心主任帮助参加者发展识别和处理成功戒烟障碍的技能,为他们坚持戒烟计划提供支持,并讨论他们在戒烟过程中遇到的挑战和障碍。结果:23人被纳入研究,其中20人被认为是参与者。受试者戒烟率为22%,参与者戒烟率为25%。总的来说,我们发现在8个疗程中,所有参与者平均每天的吸烟量都有统计学上的显著下降。几乎所有的参与者都未能完成与医疗保健提供者的第5和第8期。所有参与者都对计划的灵活性,舒适度,积极性和CHW的帮助给予了100%的满意度。结论:在我们的戒烟服务试点研究中,在弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚社区使用chw似乎很有希望。在诊所设置的第五和第八次会议中注意到挑战。这可能是由于日程安排上的挑战、对就诊费用和交通的担忧而导致回到护理提供者那里的困难。与社区卫生工作者合作的灵活性,在他们自己的社区,而不是与护理提供者会面,可能会为在未来的戒烟计划中使用社区卫生工作者提供好处。未来的研究应探索将CHW扩展到医疗机构的综合戒烟服务中,包括成本效益分析和CHW模式的可持续性。引文格式:Lindsay Hauser, Catherine Labgold, Roger Anderson, Fabian Camacho。社区卫生工作者领导的弗吉尼亚州阿巴拉契亚地区戒烟干预[摘要]。见:第十届AACR会议论文集:种族/少数民族和医疗服务不足人群的癌症健康差异科学;2017年9月25-28日;亚特兰大,乔治亚州。费城(PA): AACR;癌症流行病学杂志,2018;27(7增刊):摘要nr B21。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信