Tips for Statistical Tools for Research Methods in Exercise and Sport Sciences

S. Aliberti, F. D’Elia, Domenico Cherubini
{"title":"Tips for Statistical Tools for Research Methods in Exercise and Sport Sciences","authors":"S. Aliberti, F. D’Elia, Domenico Cherubini","doi":"10.17309/tmfv.2023.3.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study purpose. The increasing amount of research in Exercise and Sport Sciences emphasized the use of increasingly heuristic statistical tools appropriate to the aim in terms of qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative-quantitative data. Often, a lack of knowledge of statistical tools and their appropriateness for data analysis, especially between the use of parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques, is encountered by researchers. This requires the indispensable use of statistical experts, who, for the comprehensive understanding of the research design, need the use of human and economic resources that could probably be used differently and more efficiently. The aim of this study was to provide a list of the most used statistical methods in Exercise and Sport Sciences, focusing on the distinction between parametric and non-parametric statistical processing for both quantitative and qualitative research.\nMaterials and methods. The method was the literature review with argumentative elaborations concerning the validity of the use of the statistical tools.\nResults. A total of 22 statistical tools, both parametric and non-parametric, were found: 5 useful to test relationship, 7 to compare two groups and 10 to compare two or more groups. For each statistical tool, a scientific paper related to Exercise and Sport Sciences was collected.\nConclusions. These data allow developing potential guidelines, applying to Exercise and Sport Sciences, for the rigorous model of research projects with a systematic use of statistical processing in the complete hypothesis of the study.","PeriodicalId":178000,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education Theory and Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2023.3.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Study purpose. The increasing amount of research in Exercise and Sport Sciences emphasized the use of increasingly heuristic statistical tools appropriate to the aim in terms of qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative-quantitative data. Often, a lack of knowledge of statistical tools and their appropriateness for data analysis, especially between the use of parametric and non-parametric statistical techniques, is encountered by researchers. This requires the indispensable use of statistical experts, who, for the comprehensive understanding of the research design, need the use of human and economic resources that could probably be used differently and more efficiently. The aim of this study was to provide a list of the most used statistical methods in Exercise and Sport Sciences, focusing on the distinction between parametric and non-parametric statistical processing for both quantitative and qualitative research. Materials and methods. The method was the literature review with argumentative elaborations concerning the validity of the use of the statistical tools. Results. A total of 22 statistical tools, both parametric and non-parametric, were found: 5 useful to test relationship, 7 to compare two groups and 10 to compare two or more groups. For each statistical tool, a scientific paper related to Exercise and Sport Sciences was collected. Conclusions. These data allow developing potential guidelines, applying to Exercise and Sport Sciences, for the rigorous model of research projects with a systematic use of statistical processing in the complete hypothesis of the study.
运动与运动科学研究方法的统计工具提示
研究的目的。在运动和体育科学领域,越来越多的研究强调使用越来越多的启发式统计工具,以达到定性、定量和定性-定量数据的目的。研究人员经常遇到统计工具及其对数据分析的适当性缺乏知识,特别是在使用参数和非参数统计技术之间。这就需要不可或缺地使用统计专家,为了全面了解研究设计,统计专家需要使用人力和经济资源,而这些资源可能可以以不同的方式更有效地使用。本研究的目的是提供运动和体育科学中最常用的统计方法的列表,重点是定量和定性研究中参数和非参数统计处理之间的区别。材料和方法。方法是文献回顾,并对统计工具使用的有效性进行论证性阐述。共发现22种统计工具,包括参数和非参数:5种用于检验关系,7种用于比较两组,10种用于比较两个或更多组。对于每种统计工具,收集一篇与运动和运动科学相关的科学论文。这些数据允许开发潜在的指导方针,应用于运动和体育科学,用于严谨的研究项目模型,在研究的完整假设中系统地使用统计处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信