Common Myths About Entrustable Professional Activities

Abstract

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are continuously gaining worldwide popularity in competency-based clinical training programmes. EPAs are discrete units of professional practice that are used to determine the readiness of a trainee in a particular training context. Despite their evergrowing recognition in health professions education, some critical misconceptions exist on the original nuance of EPAs that can potentially compromise their utility and operationalisation. For instance, EPAs are often confused with other educational entities such as competencies, outcomes and abilities. In this study, we attempt to address some common myths associated with EPAs and provide further clarification through examples to help readers differentiate between a true and a pseudo EPAs.