The Transatlantic Relationship: Challenges of Troubled Times

O. Prikhodko
{"title":"The Transatlantic Relationship: Challenges of Troubled Times","authors":"O. Prikhodko","doi":"10.18254/s207054760007145-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with underlying tendencies that have shaped the transatlantic divisions by the midterm of Donald Trump presidency. It scrutinizes the origins of disagreements which have strained the relationship between the United States and Europe (the EU) since the 45th US President took the office. There is ample evidence which helps to explain why D. Trump’s views have predetermined to a large extent a grave discord with the European allies. However, his outlook reflects way of thinking of a considerable part of American society which considers that America bears an excessive burden of obligations abroad. The US administration’s policies on some international issues (e.g. global trade, climate warming, arms control, Iran) fuel erosion of the long-standing transatlantic consensus. In the author’s judgment, some unfolding crisis-type events in the U.S.-European relations are unprecedented. They originate from incompatible mindsets of leaders on both sides of the Atlantic, from clash of values and views on some key issues and challenges – open market vs. protectionism, multilateralism vs. unilateralism, and international agreements vs. selfish behavior. The ongoing acrimonious trade disputes between the United States and the EU revealed a tough conflict of their interests. They have gotten a high political profile due to the Trump administration’s inclination to regard purely trade spat in terms of national security. The politized approach taken by the U.S. President on trade deficit and tariffs has only exacerbated the tension. The unilateralist, aggressive line pursued by Washington in the international affairs has stirred up European attempts to vitalize the concept of Europe’s ‘strategic autonomy’ worded in the EU ‘Global Strategy’ 2016. The article concludes that the transatlantic divisions may be essentially mitigated with a change of U.S. policies resulted from the U.S. presidential election in 2020.","PeriodicalId":234634,"journal":{"name":"Russia and America in the 21st Century","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia and America in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207054760007145-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with underlying tendencies that have shaped the transatlantic divisions by the midterm of Donald Trump presidency. It scrutinizes the origins of disagreements which have strained the relationship between the United States and Europe (the EU) since the 45th US President took the office. There is ample evidence which helps to explain why D. Trump’s views have predetermined to a large extent a grave discord with the European allies. However, his outlook reflects way of thinking of a considerable part of American society which considers that America bears an excessive burden of obligations abroad. The US administration’s policies on some international issues (e.g. global trade, climate warming, arms control, Iran) fuel erosion of the long-standing transatlantic consensus. In the author’s judgment, some unfolding crisis-type events in the U.S.-European relations are unprecedented. They originate from incompatible mindsets of leaders on both sides of the Atlantic, from clash of values and views on some key issues and challenges – open market vs. protectionism, multilateralism vs. unilateralism, and international agreements vs. selfish behavior. The ongoing acrimonious trade disputes between the United States and the EU revealed a tough conflict of their interests. They have gotten a high political profile due to the Trump administration’s inclination to regard purely trade spat in terms of national security. The politized approach taken by the U.S. President on trade deficit and tariffs has only exacerbated the tension. The unilateralist, aggressive line pursued by Washington in the international affairs has stirred up European attempts to vitalize the concept of Europe’s ‘strategic autonomy’ worded in the EU ‘Global Strategy’ 2016. The article concludes that the transatlantic divisions may be essentially mitigated with a change of U.S. policies resulted from the U.S. presidential election in 2020.
跨大西洋关系:困难时期的挑战
本文探讨了在唐纳德•特朗普(Donald Trump)担任美国总统期间形成跨大西洋分歧的潜在趋势。它仔细研究了自美国第45任总统上任以来美国和欧洲(欧盟)之间紧张关系的分歧的起源。有充分的证据有助于解释,为什么特朗普的观点在很大程度上决定了他与欧洲盟友的严重不和。然而,他的观点反映了相当一部分美国社会的思维方式,他们认为美国承担了过多的海外义务。美国政府在一些国际问题(如全球贸易、气候变暖、军备控制、伊朗)上的政策,进一步削弱了长期存在的跨大西洋共识。在作者看来,美欧关系中出现的一些危机型事件是前所未有的。它们源于大西洋两岸领导人不相容的思维方式,源于在一些关键问题和挑战上的价值观和观点的冲突——开放市场与保护主义、多边主义与单边主义、国际协议与自私行为。美国和欧盟之间持续激烈的贸易争端暴露了他们之间严峻的利益冲突。由于特朗普政府倾向于将纯粹的贸易争端视为国家安全问题,它们在政治上受到了高度关注。美国总统在贸易逆差和关税问题上采取的政治化做法只会加剧紧张局势。华盛顿在国际事务中奉行的单边主义、咄咄逼人的路线,激起了欧洲试图重振欧盟“2016年全球战略”中提出的欧洲“战略自主”概念的企图。这篇文章的结论是,随着2020年美国总统大选导致的美国政策的变化,跨大西洋的分歧可能会从根本上得到缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信