Eitanāzijas konstitucionalitāte

Aleksandra Kristiāna Priede
{"title":"Eitanāzijas konstitucionalitāte","authors":"Aleksandra Kristiāna Priede","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to life is the bedrock of all human rights. It is a natural right that arises from the fact of being born. While the right to life seems self-evident today, it still remains an open question whether it also encompasses the right to die, hence – the right to euthanasia. International law does not regulate euthanasia, it is left to the discretion of each state. In this article, the author analyses the compatibility of euthanasia with the Latvian legal system. The article examines whether and how the human right to life can be legally restricted. Most importantly, the ways in which the right to life could be restricted as a justification, and whether it is possible for the right of euthanasia to become a part of our legal system.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The right to life is the bedrock of all human rights. It is a natural right that arises from the fact of being born. While the right to life seems self-evident today, it still remains an open question whether it also encompasses the right to die, hence – the right to euthanasia. International law does not regulate euthanasia, it is left to the discretion of each state. In this article, the author analyses the compatibility of euthanasia with the Latvian legal system. The article examines whether and how the human right to life can be legally restricted. Most importantly, the ways in which the right to life could be restricted as a justification, and whether it is possible for the right of euthanasia to become a part of our legal system.
生命权是一切人权的基石。这是一种自然权利,源于出生的事实。虽然生命权在今天看来是不言而喻的,但它是否也包括死亡的权利,也就是安乐死的权利,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。国际法没有规定安乐死,这是每个国家的自由裁量权。在本文中,作者分析了安乐死与拉脱维亚法律制度的兼容性。这篇文章探讨了生命权是否以及如何在法律上受到限制。最重要的是,以何种方式限制生命权作为正当理由,以及安乐死权是否有可能成为我们法律体系的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信