Household Survey Panels: How Much Do Following Rules Affect Sample Size?

Matthias Schonlau, N. Watson, M. Kroh
{"title":"Household Survey Panels: How Much Do Following Rules Affect Sample Size?","authors":"Matthias Schonlau, N. Watson, M. Kroh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1736591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In household panels, typically all household members are surveyed. Because household composition changes over time, so-called following rules are implemented to decide whether to continue surveying household members who leave the household (e.g. former spouses/partners, grown children) in subsequent waves. Following rules have been largely ignored in the literature leaving panel designers unaware of the breadth of their options and forcing them to make ad hoc decisions. In particular, to what extent various following rules affect sample size over time is unknown. From an operational point of view such knowledge is important because sample size greatly affects costs. Moreover, the decision of whom to follow has irreversible consequences as finding household members who moved out years earlier is very difficult. We find that household survey panels implement a wide variety of following rules but their effect on sample size is relatively limited. Even after 25 years, the rule “follow only wave 1 respondents” still captures 85% of the respondents of the rule “follow everyone who can be traced back to a wave 1 household through living arrangements”. Almost all of the remaining 15% live in households of children of wave 1 respondents who have grown up (5%) and in households of former spouses/partners (10%). Unless attrition is low, there is no danger of an ever expanding panel because even wide following rules do not typically exceed attrition.","PeriodicalId":331095,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research Working Paper Series","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Institute: Applied Economic & Social Research Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1736591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

In household panels, typically all household members are surveyed. Because household composition changes over time, so-called following rules are implemented to decide whether to continue surveying household members who leave the household (e.g. former spouses/partners, grown children) in subsequent waves. Following rules have been largely ignored in the literature leaving panel designers unaware of the breadth of their options and forcing them to make ad hoc decisions. In particular, to what extent various following rules affect sample size over time is unknown. From an operational point of view such knowledge is important because sample size greatly affects costs. Moreover, the decision of whom to follow has irreversible consequences as finding household members who moved out years earlier is very difficult. We find that household survey panels implement a wide variety of following rules but their effect on sample size is relatively limited. Even after 25 years, the rule “follow only wave 1 respondents” still captures 85% of the respondents of the rule “follow everyone who can be traced back to a wave 1 household through living arrangements”. Almost all of the remaining 15% live in households of children of wave 1 respondents who have grown up (5%) and in households of former spouses/partners (10%). Unless attrition is low, there is no danger of an ever expanding panel because even wide following rules do not typically exceed attrition.
住户调查小组:下列规则对样本量有多大影响?
在家庭小组中,通常对所有家庭成员进行调查。由于家庭组成随时间而变化,因此实施了所谓的遵循规则,以决定是否在随后的浪潮中继续调查离开家庭的家庭成员(例如前配偶/伴侣、成年子女)。以下规则在很大程度上被忽略了,这使得面板设计师不知道他们的选择范围,并迫使他们做出临时决定。特别是,随着时间的推移,各种规则对样本量的影响程度是未知的。从操作的角度来看,这些知识很重要,因为样本大小会极大地影响成本。此外,决定跟随谁会产生不可逆转的后果,因为找到早几年搬出去的家庭成员非常困难。我们发现,家庭调查面板实施了各种各样的以下规则,但它们对样本量的影响相对有限。即使在25年后,“只关注第一波受访者”的规则仍然吸引了85%的“通过生活安排可以追溯到第一波家庭的所有人”的规则的受访者。其余15%的人几乎都生活在第一轮受访者的子女(5%)和前配偶/伴侣(10%)的家庭中。除非流失率很低,否则不会有不断扩大的小组的危险,因为即使是广泛遵循的规则通常也不会超过流失率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信