Gaze alignment of interlocutors in conversational dialogues

K. Hadelich, M. Crocker
{"title":"Gaze alignment of interlocutors in conversational dialogues","authors":"K. Hadelich, M. Crocker","doi":"10.1145/1117309.1117322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the area of Psycholinguistics, eye-tracking has been a successful and valuable tool for the investigation of on-line processes of language comprehension and language production (e.g., [Griffin and Bock 2000], [Tanenhaus et al. 1995]). However, the application of eye-tracking to the investigation of mechanisms underlying more naturalistic language use, e.g. dialogue, has so far been limited to the examination of eye-movements of either the speaker or the listener in isolation (e.g., [Brown-Schmidt et al. 2005]; [Richardson and Dale 2004]). Even offline dialogue experiments investigating, e.g. priming effects, usually involve only one \"real\" participant while their interlocutor is a confederate of the experimenter. In order to test predictions coming from dialogue models (e.g., [Pickering and Garrod 2004]) and in order to provide the kinds of evidence necessary for their further development, experimental methods that directly examine behaviour of participants actually engaged in a conversation are needed. Additionally, eye-tracking measures established in psycholinguistic monologue research need to be compared with their dialogue processing counterparts. Furthermore, new measures describing the relation between speaker and listener eye-movements in communication are needed, as they can give rise to the language mechanisms underlying conversational interaction.","PeriodicalId":440675,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1117309.1117322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

In the area of Psycholinguistics, eye-tracking has been a successful and valuable tool for the investigation of on-line processes of language comprehension and language production (e.g., [Griffin and Bock 2000], [Tanenhaus et al. 1995]). However, the application of eye-tracking to the investigation of mechanisms underlying more naturalistic language use, e.g. dialogue, has so far been limited to the examination of eye-movements of either the speaker or the listener in isolation (e.g., [Brown-Schmidt et al. 2005]; [Richardson and Dale 2004]). Even offline dialogue experiments investigating, e.g. priming effects, usually involve only one "real" participant while their interlocutor is a confederate of the experimenter. In order to test predictions coming from dialogue models (e.g., [Pickering and Garrod 2004]) and in order to provide the kinds of evidence necessary for their further development, experimental methods that directly examine behaviour of participants actually engaged in a conversation are needed. Additionally, eye-tracking measures established in psycholinguistic monologue research need to be compared with their dialogue processing counterparts. Furthermore, new measures describing the relation between speaker and listener eye-movements in communication are needed, as they can give rise to the language mechanisms underlying conversational interaction.
对话性对话中对话者的凝视对齐
在心理语言学领域,眼动追踪已经成为一种成功而有价值的工具,用于研究语言理解和语言产生的在线过程(例如,[Griffin and Bock 2000], [Tanenhaus et al. 1995])。然而,迄今为止,眼动追踪在调查更自然的语言使用机制(例如对话)中的应用仅限于单独检查说话者或听者的眼球运动(例如,[Brown-Schmidt等人,2005];[Richardson and Dale 2004])。即使是调查的离线对话实验,例如启动效应,通常也只涉及一个“真实”参与者,而他们的对话者是实验者的同伙。为了测试来自对话模型的预测(例如,[Pickering and Garrod 2004]),并为其进一步发展提供必要的证据,需要直接检查实际参与对话的参与者行为的实验方法。此外,心理语言独白研究中建立的眼动追踪方法需要与对话处理方法进行比较。此外,还需要新的测量方法来描述说话者和听者在交流中的眼动关系,因为它们可以产生会话互动背后的语言机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信