Industry 'Closeness' and the Contagion Effects of Accounting Information Announcements

Jonathan F. Ross
{"title":"Industry 'Closeness' and the Contagion Effects of Accounting Information Announcements","authors":"Jonathan F. Ross","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2266586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firm closeness or comparability is an important concept to investors. Knowing that two firms have been historically close and observing an information announcement by one of the firms gives the investor cues as to the future performance of the other firm. Furthermore, from a methodological point of view, researchers commonly control for firm-group closeness by using industrial classification schemes such as the SIC. To the extent that these schemes group dissimilar firms, the advantage of using these schemes is undermined.This paper more formally examines the comparability concept and develops a new measure of firm -- group accounting closeness. The measure is based on the co-movement of accounting fundamentals. This measure adds to the De Franco et al. measure in the sense that it is designed to judge the closeness of a group of firms, rather than just firm-pairs. I provide insight regarding the extent to which the SIC scheme groups similar firms. The mean SIC two-digit industry closeness over the time period 1999-2010 is 0.15 (on a scale of 0 to 1). I demonstrate that this is only slightly better than if the groups were randomly chosen. Furthermore, a trading strategy utilizing information in the measure is developed and tested. Results indicate that, when industry closeness is high enough, abnormal returns in the range of 1-3% over a 1-3 day window can be earned around leader information announcement dates. Finally, I replicate Gleason et al. (2008) and document that the industry contagion effect of an accounting restatement is increasing with the closeness of that industry.Together, these two results contribute to the contagion/information transfer literature by empirically establishing a positive relationship between the industry contagion effects of an accounting information announcement and the closeness of that particular industry. These two results also help to bolster the construct validity of the closeness measure.","PeriodicalId":202880,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2266586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Firm closeness or comparability is an important concept to investors. Knowing that two firms have been historically close and observing an information announcement by one of the firms gives the investor cues as to the future performance of the other firm. Furthermore, from a methodological point of view, researchers commonly control for firm-group closeness by using industrial classification schemes such as the SIC. To the extent that these schemes group dissimilar firms, the advantage of using these schemes is undermined.This paper more formally examines the comparability concept and develops a new measure of firm -- group accounting closeness. The measure is based on the co-movement of accounting fundamentals. This measure adds to the De Franco et al. measure in the sense that it is designed to judge the closeness of a group of firms, rather than just firm-pairs. I provide insight regarding the extent to which the SIC scheme groups similar firms. The mean SIC two-digit industry closeness over the time period 1999-2010 is 0.15 (on a scale of 0 to 1). I demonstrate that this is only slightly better than if the groups were randomly chosen. Furthermore, a trading strategy utilizing information in the measure is developed and tested. Results indicate that, when industry closeness is high enough, abnormal returns in the range of 1-3% over a 1-3 day window can be earned around leader information announcement dates. Finally, I replicate Gleason et al. (2008) and document that the industry contagion effect of an accounting restatement is increasing with the closeness of that industry.Together, these two results contribute to the contagion/information transfer literature by empirically establishing a positive relationship between the industry contagion effects of an accounting information announcement and the closeness of that particular industry. These two results also help to bolster the construct validity of the closeness measure.
行业“贴近度”与会计信息公告的传染效应
公司的接近性或可比性对投资者来说是一个重要的概念。了解两家公司历史上的密切关系,并观察其中一家公司的信息公告,可以为投资者提供另一家公司未来表现的线索。此外,从方法论的角度来看,研究人员通常通过使用行业分类方案(如SIC)来控制公司-集团的密切程度。在某种程度上,这些计划将不同的公司组合在一起,使用这些计划的优势就被削弱了。本文更正式地考察了可比性概念,并开发了一种新的衡量公司集团会计接近度的方法。该措施是基于会计基本原则的共同运动。这一措施增加了De Franco等人的措施,因为它旨在判断一组公司的亲密程度,而不仅仅是公司对。我提供了关于SIC计划将类似公司分组的程度的见解。1999年至2010年期间,SIC两位数行业的平均接近度为0.15(在0到1的范围内)。我证明,这只比随机选择的分组好一点。此外,一个交易策略利用信息的措施是开发和测试。结果表明,当行业接近度足够高时,在领导者信息公布日期前后的1-3天窗口内,可以获得1-3%范围内的异常回报。最后,我复制了Gleason et al.(2008),并证明会计重述的行业传染效应随着该行业的密切程度而增加。总之,这两个结果通过实证建立会计信息公告的行业传染效应与该特定行业的密切程度之间的正相关关系,为传染/信息转移文献做出了贡献。这两个结果也有助于增强亲密度测量的结构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信