Ethical challenges in the use of information in selected public and private university libraries in Ghana

E. Ankrah, P. Fordjour, Florence Odarkor Entsua-Mensah
{"title":"Ethical challenges in the use of information in selected public and private university libraries in Ghana","authors":"E. Ankrah, P. Fordjour, Florence Odarkor Entsua-Mensah","doi":"10.4314/glj.v28i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Library professionals all over the world constantly encounter an ethical issue that affects the dissemination of information. Academic libraries are faced with different ethical challenges including information dissemination, lack of financial resources, human capacity etc. The study explored the ethical challenges in the use of information in the selected public and private libraries in Ghana using the PAPA’s model as a guide. The study adopted the survey method and quantitative approach. The study setting was in four universities namely: KNUST (public), UG (public), Central University (private) and Garden City (private). Ninety-three (93) library staff were the total population surveyed. The sampling technique employed was purposive sampling, whiles questionnaires were the instrument in use in collecting data. All data collected in person and online were coded and analyzed using SPSS version 26. After analysis, the results were presented in tables and charts. The study revealed that scholarly materials are the nature of information materials in the library, while academic books are the type of information materials in the library. The study discovered that educational books are purchased from publishers while information materials are published through the university’s repository and online system. The study also demonstrated that patented materials are the only materials that can be subjected to copyright laws. Recommendations identified include: adhering to professional codes of ethics, developing and implementing policies and procedures, encouraging originality and creativity, providing education and training on accessibility, and reviewing and updating collections and resources. ","PeriodicalId":399599,"journal":{"name":"Ghana Library Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ghana Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/glj.v28i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Library professionals all over the world constantly encounter an ethical issue that affects the dissemination of information. Academic libraries are faced with different ethical challenges including information dissemination, lack of financial resources, human capacity etc. The study explored the ethical challenges in the use of information in the selected public and private libraries in Ghana using the PAPA’s model as a guide. The study adopted the survey method and quantitative approach. The study setting was in four universities namely: KNUST (public), UG (public), Central University (private) and Garden City (private). Ninety-three (93) library staff were the total population surveyed. The sampling technique employed was purposive sampling, whiles questionnaires were the instrument in use in collecting data. All data collected in person and online were coded and analyzed using SPSS version 26. After analysis, the results were presented in tables and charts. The study revealed that scholarly materials are the nature of information materials in the library, while academic books are the type of information materials in the library. The study discovered that educational books are purchased from publishers while information materials are published through the university’s repository and online system. The study also demonstrated that patented materials are the only materials that can be subjected to copyright laws. Recommendations identified include: adhering to professional codes of ethics, developing and implementing policies and procedures, encouraging originality and creativity, providing education and training on accessibility, and reviewing and updating collections and resources. 
在加纳选定的公立和私立大学图书馆使用信息的伦理挑战
世界各地的图书馆专业人员不断遇到影响信息传播的道德问题。高校图书馆面临着信息传播、经费不足、人力资源不足等多方面的伦理挑战。该研究以PAPA的模式为指导,探讨了加纳选定的公共和私人图书馆在使用信息时面临的伦理挑战。本研究采用调查法和定量方法。研究设置在四所大学,即:KNUST(公立),UG(公立),中央大学(私立)和花园城市(私立)。调查的总人数为93名图书馆工作人员。采用的抽样技术是有目的抽样,而调查问卷是收集数据的工具。所有亲自和在线收集的数据均使用SPSS 26进行编码和分析。分析结果以表格形式呈现。研究表明,学术资料是图书馆信息资料的性质,而学术书籍是图书馆信息资料的类型。研究发现,教育书籍是从出版商那里购买的,而信息资料则是通过大学的知识库和在线系统发布的。该研究还表明,获得专利的材料是唯一可以受版权法约束的材料。确定的建议包括:遵守职业道德准则,制定和实施政策和程序,鼓励独创性和创造力,提供无障碍教育和培训,审查和更新馆藏和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信