CSR Communication Tactics and the Micro-Accumulation of Reputational Capital

Gregory D. Saxton
{"title":"CSR Communication Tactics and the Micro-Accumulation of Reputational Capital","authors":"Gregory D. Saxton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3191650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing evidence corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance should be understood as something that is not just reported but communicated. Particularly with the advent of social media, CSR is increasingly seen not just in one-way disclosure but in firms’ mobilizational efforts, two-way dialogue with stakeholders, public educational messages, and a variety of other discursive and conversational tactics. Moreover, some of these tactics are more likely to influence public perceptions of the firm. Examining the 18,722 original messages sent by Fortune 200 firms’ dedicated CSR feeds on Twitter in 2014, I thus identify nine communication tactics and test how they are linked to micro-level changes in two dimensions of corporate reputation. I find the aware- ness dimension of reputation is driven by the use of informational tactics such as disclosure, while reputational favorability is significantly influenced not by the provision of information but by the use of more interactive communicative tactics. This study provides evidence of a number of new, non-reporting-based CSR communication tactics and illustrates how firms acquire reputational capital on a micro-, message-by-message, day-to-day level.","PeriodicalId":388758,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Social Media Issues (Topic)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Social Media Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3191650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is growing evidence corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance should be understood as something that is not just reported but communicated. Particularly with the advent of social media, CSR is increasingly seen not just in one-way disclosure but in firms’ mobilizational efforts, two-way dialogue with stakeholders, public educational messages, and a variety of other discursive and conversational tactics. Moreover, some of these tactics are more likely to influence public perceptions of the firm. Examining the 18,722 original messages sent by Fortune 200 firms’ dedicated CSR feeds on Twitter in 2014, I thus identify nine communication tactics and test how they are linked to micro-level changes in two dimensions of corporate reputation. I find the aware- ness dimension of reputation is driven by the use of informational tactics such as disclosure, while reputational favorability is significantly influenced not by the provision of information but by the use of more interactive communicative tactics. This study provides evidence of a number of new, non-reporting-based CSR communication tactics and illustrates how firms acquire reputational capital on a micro-, message-by-message, day-to-day level.
企业社会责任传播策略与声誉资本的微观积累
越来越多的证据表明,企业社会责任(CSR)的表现不仅应该被理解为报告,而且应该被理解为沟通。特别是随着社会媒体的出现,企业社会责任越来越不仅仅体现在单向披露上,还体现在企业的动员努力、与利益相关者的双向对话、公共教育信息以及各种其他话语和对话策略上。此外,其中一些策略更有可能影响公众对公司的看法。通过分析2014年《财富》200强企业在Twitter上发布的18722条企业社会责任信息,我确定了9种沟通策略,并测试了它们与企业声誉两个维度的微观层面变化之间的关系。我发现声誉的意识维度是由信息策略(如披露)的使用所驱动的,而声誉好感度的显著影响不是由信息的提供,而是由更多互动沟通策略的使用所影响。本研究提供了一些新的、非基于报告的企业社会责任沟通策略的证据,并说明了企业如何在微的、逐条的、日常的层面上获得声誉资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信