Theòs metaphérōn. The Metaphorizing God.

Borislav Mikulić
{"title":"Theòs metaphérōn. The Metaphorizing God.","authors":"Borislav Mikulić","doi":"10.19090/gff.2022.2.15-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a close reading of Plato's use of substituting terms for metaphor and of the notion paradigm in his later dialogues, as well as of Aristotle's criticism of the overall 'paradigmatic discourse' in Plato, the paper tries to elaborate some new arguments, not included or insufficiently recognised in recent scholarly writing, for the position that Plato's conception cannot be reduced to the old-fashioned metaphysical model of the universal-particular relationship. He offers, instead, a dynamic model of dialectical cross-relations of genera, species and particulars that acts productively in several theoretical directions, aiming both at coherence and foundation of discourse. The paper supplements a related study on the use of paradigm in modern and contemporary philosophies of science, trying out a Wittgensteinian solution to some enigmas in Plato's notion of the 'ultimate paradigm' at the 'metaphysical' level of his theory of 'highest principles'. It is part of a broader research for a book on metaphors in the discourse of philosophy and sciences.","PeriodicalId":175606,"journal":{"name":"Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Годишњак Филозофског факултета у Новом Саду","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19090/gff.2022.2.15-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a close reading of Plato's use of substituting terms for metaphor and of the notion paradigm in his later dialogues, as well as of Aristotle's criticism of the overall 'paradigmatic discourse' in Plato, the paper tries to elaborate some new arguments, not included or insufficiently recognised in recent scholarly writing, for the position that Plato's conception cannot be reduced to the old-fashioned metaphysical model of the universal-particular relationship. He offers, instead, a dynamic model of dialectical cross-relations of genera, species and particulars that acts productively in several theoretical directions, aiming both at coherence and foundation of discourse. The paper supplements a related study on the use of paradigm in modern and contemporary philosophies of science, trying out a Wittgensteinian solution to some enigmas in Plato's notion of the 'ultimate paradigm' at the 'metaphysical' level of his theory of 'highest principles'. It is part of a broader research for a book on metaphors in the discourse of philosophy and sciences.
西奥斯隐喻ōn。隐喻上帝。
在仔细阅读柏拉图在他后来的对话中对隐喻和概念范式的替代术语的使用,以及亚里士多德对柏拉图的整体“范式话语”的批评后,本文试图阐述一些新的论点,这些论点在最近的学术著作中没有包括或没有得到充分认识,因为柏拉图的概念不能被简化为普遍-特殊关系的老式形而上学模型。相反,他提供了一种动态的属、种和特殊的辩证交叉关系模型,这种模型在几个理论方向上起着富有成效的作用,旨在实现话语的连贯性和基础。本文补充了在现当代科学哲学中使用范式的相关研究,试图在柏拉图的“最高原则”理论的“形而上学”层面上,以维特根斯坦的方式解决柏拉图的“终极范式”概念中的一些谜题。这是一本关于哲学和科学话语中的隐喻的书的更广泛研究的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信