循環經濟發展與產品永續性誘因理論與實證

顏素真 顏素真, 李堅明 Su-Chen Yuan
{"title":"循環經濟發展與產品永續性誘因理論與實證","authors":"顏素真 顏素真, 李堅明 Su-Chen Yuan","doi":"10.53106/054696002022120112006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 產品設計階段將影響產品生命週期80% 的環境衝擊,因此,缺乏環境完整性思維是現行固體廢棄物管理策略的限制。本研究建立產品生命週期收費制度,探討產品生命週期環境完整性與產品永續性誘因設計問題,以及分析綠色投資短視問題。本研究發現如下:(1) 最終產品處置之差別費率相較於固定費率,可提高廠商對產品環境化設計的誘因;(2) 以排放量為費基,將較以廢棄物量為費基,具有較高的生態化設計投資誘因;(3) 差別費率下,較高污染密集廠商或產業愈具有清潔生產的誘因;(4) 提高消費者綠色產品偏好,是激勵綠色生產的重要驅動力;(5) 建立產品永續性等級,創造綠色產品外部效益內部化,是因應廠商投資短視行為的重要誘因設計。本研究進一步以國內資料,驗證相關的學理結果。\n Up to 80% of Product’s environmental impact are determined at design phase, therefore, lacking of environmental integrity thinking is the key shortage of current solid waste management. This paper introduces Product Life Cycle Emission Fee Model to describe how the integrated product policy of life cycle production to encourage the product sustainable design incentive. Besides, we also presents the obstacles of green investment due to the myopic behavior. The key finds are as follows: (1) Adopting a discrimination rate for final waste disposal that would be more effective in encouraging environmentally friendly designing; (2) Higher emission allowance price will facilitate firm to produce much green products; (3) Higher emission intensive of the final disposal wastes will stimulate more productive investment as well as environmentally friendly capital investment, leaving abatement capital stock unchanged; (4) Promoting consumer’s preference of green products is the driving force to facilitate green production of the firm; (5) Internalizing the external benefit of green product is a key strategy to overcome the investment myopic behavior for encouraging environmental design investment. This study further validates the theoretical results with domestic data.\n \n","PeriodicalId":254216,"journal":{"name":"應用經濟論叢","volume":"470 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"應用經濟論叢","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/054696002022120112006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

產品設計階段將影響產品生命週期80% 的環境衝擊,因此,缺乏環境完整性思維是現行固體廢棄物管理策略的限制。本研究建立產品生命週期收費制度,探討產品生命週期環境完整性與產品永續性誘因設計問題,以及分析綠色投資短視問題。本研究發現如下:(1) 最終產品處置之差別費率相較於固定費率,可提高廠商對產品環境化設計的誘因;(2) 以排放量為費基,將較以廢棄物量為費基,具有較高的生態化設計投資誘因;(3) 差別費率下,較高污染密集廠商或產業愈具有清潔生產的誘因;(4) 提高消費者綠色產品偏好,是激勵綠色生產的重要驅動力;(5) 建立產品永續性等級,創造綠色產品外部效益內部化,是因應廠商投資短視行為的重要誘因設計。本研究進一步以國內資料,驗證相關的學理結果。  Up to 80% of Product’s environmental impact are determined at design phase, therefore, lacking of environmental integrity thinking is the key shortage of current solid waste management. This paper introduces Product Life Cycle Emission Fee Model to describe how the integrated product policy of life cycle production to encourage the product sustainable design incentive. Besides, we also presents the obstacles of green investment due to the myopic behavior. The key finds are as follows: (1) Adopting a discrimination rate for final waste disposal that would be more effective in encouraging environmentally friendly designing; (2) Higher emission allowance price will facilitate firm to produce much green products; (3) Higher emission intensive of the final disposal wastes will stimulate more productive investment as well as environmentally friendly capital investment, leaving abatement capital stock unchanged; (4) Promoting consumer’s preference of green products is the driving force to facilitate green production of the firm; (5) Internalizing the external benefit of green product is a key strategy to overcome the investment myopic behavior for encouraging environmental design investment. This study further validates the theoretical results with domestic data.  
循环经济发展与产品永续性诱因理论与实证
产品设计阶段将影响产品生命周期80% 的环境冲击,因此,缺乏环境完整性思维是现行固体废弃物管理策略的限制。本研究建立产品生命周期收费制度,探讨产品生命周期环境完整性与产品永续性诱因设计问题,以及分析绿色投资短视问题。本研究发现如下:(1) 最终产品处置之差别费率相较于固定费率,可提高厂商对产品环境化设计的诱因;(2) 以排放量为费基,将较以废弃物量为费基,具有较高的生态化设计投资诱因;(3) 差别费率下,较高污染密集厂商或产业愈具有清洁生产的诱因;(4) 提高消费者绿色产品偏好,是激励绿色生产的重要驱动力;(5) 建立产品永续性等级,创造绿色产品外部效益内部化,是因应厂商投资短视行为的重要诱因设计。本研究进一步以国内资料,验证相关的学理结果。 Up to 80% of Product’s environmental impact are determined at design phase, therefore, lacking of environmental integrity thinking is the key shortage of current solid waste management. This paper introduces Product Life Cycle Emission Fee Model to describe how the integrated product policy of life cycle production to encourage the product sustainable design incentive. Besides, we also presents the obstacles of green investment due to the myopic behavior. The key finds are as follows: (1) Adopting a discrimination rate for final waste disposal that would be more effective in encouraging environmentally friendly designing; (2) Higher emission allowance price will facilitate firm to produce much green products; (3) Higher emission intensive of the final disposal wastes will stimulate more productive investment as well as environmentally friendly capital investment, leaving abatement capital stock unchanged; (4) Promoting consumer’s preference of green products is the driving force to facilitate green production of the firm; (5) Internalizing the external benefit of green product is a key strategy to overcome the investment myopic behavior for encouraging environmental design investment. This study further validates the theoretical results with domestic data.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信