The barbarian’s periphery of Byzantine Empire (some arguments about the origin of Turk’s tribes)

Olesia Zhdanovych
{"title":"The barbarian’s periphery of Byzantine Empire (some arguments about the origin of Turk’s tribes)","authors":"Olesia Zhdanovych","doi":"10.17721/2518-1270.2020.62.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes some of barbarians in the northern periphery of the Byzantine Empire. The barbaric periphery of Byzantium in the early Middle Ages was quite diverse. World historiography is rich in research on Western European barbarians. There are still many questions about the nomadic peoples that appeared at different times on the territory of the Dnieper, the Black Sea and the Danube, and their relations with the Byzantine Empire in the early Middle Ages. Oriental scholars research the northeastern nomads separately, while the medieval Byzantine scholars focus on problems related to the inner life of the Empire. The foreign policy focus is mainly directed at the closer barbarians who established themselves in the territory of the West. However, there are many questions about cooperation between the Turkic nomads and romans during the period of their active contacts. Official diplomatic missions between two civilized worlds, thanks to the sources that describe embassies, allow us to see not only relations between empires, but also some ways of life, social structure and political organization in nomad’s states. In the context of the analysis of active contacts between the romans and the nomads, we turn to the problem of the origin of «barbarians»and their contacts with the Byzantines. The ethnogenesis of some Turkic peoples and their migration from northeast to southwest still raises more questions in the world historiography than answers. Our attempt to understand this situation is based mainly on Roman-Byzantine written evidence. A deliberately chosen analysis of the subjective Byzantine view of the origin of Turkic nomads clarifies some confusing situations regarding the researching of intercivilizational processes in Europe during the last period of the Great Migration.","PeriodicalId":247803,"journal":{"name":"Ethnic History of European Nations","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnic History of European Nations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2518-1270.2020.62.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes some of barbarians in the northern periphery of the Byzantine Empire. The barbaric periphery of Byzantium in the early Middle Ages was quite diverse. World historiography is rich in research on Western European barbarians. There are still many questions about the nomadic peoples that appeared at different times on the territory of the Dnieper, the Black Sea and the Danube, and their relations with the Byzantine Empire in the early Middle Ages. Oriental scholars research the northeastern nomads separately, while the medieval Byzantine scholars focus on problems related to the inner life of the Empire. The foreign policy focus is mainly directed at the closer barbarians who established themselves in the territory of the West. However, there are many questions about cooperation between the Turkic nomads and romans during the period of their active contacts. Official diplomatic missions between two civilized worlds, thanks to the sources that describe embassies, allow us to see not only relations between empires, but also some ways of life, social structure and political organization in nomad’s states. In the context of the analysis of active contacts between the romans and the nomads, we turn to the problem of the origin of «barbarians»and their contacts with the Byzantines. The ethnogenesis of some Turkic peoples and their migration from northeast to southwest still raises more questions in the world historiography than answers. Our attempt to understand this situation is based mainly on Roman-Byzantine written evidence. A deliberately chosen analysis of the subjective Byzantine view of the origin of Turkic nomads clarifies some confusing situations regarding the researching of intercivilizational processes in Europe during the last period of the Great Migration.
拜占庭帝国的蛮族外围(关于突厥部落起源的一些争论)
这篇文章描述了拜占庭帝国北部边缘的一些蛮族。中世纪早期,拜占庭的野蛮边缘地区非常多样化。世界史学对西欧蛮族的研究非常丰富。关于不同时期出现在第聂伯河、黑海和多瑙河地区的游牧民族,以及他们在中世纪早期与拜占庭帝国的关系,仍然存在许多疑问。东方学者单独研究东北游牧民族,而中世纪拜占庭学者则关注与帝国内部生活有关的问题。外交政策的重点主要是针对那些在西方领土上站稳脚跟的近邻野蛮人。然而,在突厥游牧民族与罗马人交往活跃的时期,突厥游牧民族与罗马人之间的合作存在许多问题。两个文明世界之间的官方外交使团,多亏了描述大使馆的资料,使我们不仅可以看到帝国之间的关系,还可以看到游牧国家的一些生活方式、社会结构和政治组织。在分析罗马人和游牧民族之间的积极接触的背景下,我们转向“野蛮人”的起源问题以及他们与拜占庭人的接触。一些突厥民族的民族发生和他们从东北向西南的迁移,在世界史学中仍然引起了更多的问题而不是答案。我们试图理解这种情况主要是基于罗马-拜占庭的书面证据。对突厥游牧民族起源的主观拜占庭观点的刻意选择的分析,澄清了大迁徙后期欧洲文明间进程研究中一些令人困惑的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信