Divided We Hack: Exploring the Degree of Sino-Russian Coordination in Cyberspace During the Ukraine War

F. Ferazza, Cosimo Melella, Konstantinos Mersinas, A. Calcara
{"title":"Divided We Hack: Exploring the Degree of Sino-Russian Coordination in Cyberspace During the Ukraine War","authors":"F. Ferazza, Cosimo Melella, Konstantinos Mersinas, A. Calcara","doi":"10.1109/EuroSPW59978.2023.00074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China and Russia are arguably NATO’s main strategic competitors and potential adversaries. Since 2017, Beijing and Moscow have conducted cyber-espionage operations against NATO members, and the two countries have also reportedly displayed more coordination in the cyber domain. These concerns have become more pressing since the outbreak of war in Ukraine, where multiple sources have shown alleged evidence of Chinese and Russian cyber-operations coordination. While it is commonly accepted that China and Russia cooperate at the strategic level in the cyber domain, this article aims at better understanding whether these two nation-states are also coordinating their affiliated cyber threat groups. We investigate this, drawing on multiple open-access data and sources. Specifically, we empirically examine the activity of three Chinese groups, Mustang Panda, Scarab and Judgment Panda, to assess the presence and degree of coordination with their Russian counterparts. Our analysis shows that, as far as the examined groups are concerned, there was no coordination between Russian and Chinese campaigns, and the latter group sometimes even targeted sensitive Russian civilian and military infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":220415,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)","volume":"408 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSPW59978.2023.00074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China and Russia are arguably NATO’s main strategic competitors and potential adversaries. Since 2017, Beijing and Moscow have conducted cyber-espionage operations against NATO members, and the two countries have also reportedly displayed more coordination in the cyber domain. These concerns have become more pressing since the outbreak of war in Ukraine, where multiple sources have shown alleged evidence of Chinese and Russian cyber-operations coordination. While it is commonly accepted that China and Russia cooperate at the strategic level in the cyber domain, this article aims at better understanding whether these two nation-states are also coordinating their affiliated cyber threat groups. We investigate this, drawing on multiple open-access data and sources. Specifically, we empirically examine the activity of three Chinese groups, Mustang Panda, Scarab and Judgment Panda, to assess the presence and degree of coordination with their Russian counterparts. Our analysis shows that, as far as the examined groups are concerned, there was no coordination between Russian and Chinese campaigns, and the latter group sometimes even targeted sensitive Russian civilian and military infrastructures.
分裂我们黑客:探讨在乌克兰战争中中俄在网络空间的协调程度
中国和俄罗斯可以说是北约的主要战略竞争对手和潜在对手。自2017年以来,北京和莫斯科对北约成员国进行了网络间谍活动,据报道,两国在网络领域也表现出了更多的协调。自乌克兰战争爆发以来,这些担忧变得更加紧迫,多个消息来源显示了据称中国和俄罗斯网络行动协调的证据。虽然人们普遍认为中国和俄罗斯在网络领域的战略层面进行合作,但本文旨在更好地了解这两个民族国家是否也在协调其附属的网络威胁组织。我们对此进行了调查,利用了多个开放获取的数据和来源。具体而言,我们实证考察了野马熊猫、圣甲虫熊猫和判断熊猫这三个中国群体的活动,以评估它们与俄罗斯群体的存在和协调程度。我们的分析表明,就被调查的组织而言,俄罗斯和中国的行动之间没有协调,后者有时甚至以敏感的俄罗斯民用和军事基础设施为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信