An Analysis of Learning Platforms based on their Academic Assessment Instruments

Andrés Felipe Herrera Ramírez, Antonio Pareja-Lora
{"title":"An Analysis of Learning Platforms based on their Academic Assessment Instruments","authors":"Andrés Felipe Herrera Ramírez, Antonio Pareja-Lora","doi":"10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the attributes (functions or characteristics) that learning platforms most frequently possess in terms of the way assessment instruments are managed or configured. Sixty-two platforms have been analyzed, and this analysis has allowed to identify 15 attributes associated with the management of assessment instruments. In order to fulfill the purpose of this study, the following steps were proposed: (1) web search of learning environments (either Learning Management Systems -LMS- or Learning Platforms -LP) used in the academic world; (2) filtering of the environments found, according to appropriate exclusion- inclusion criteria; (3) characterization of the dismissed LMS or LP according to their exclusion criteria; (4) identification and study of the attributes related to the management of assessment instruments or tests of each platform included in the study; (5) descriptive analysis of all the environments according to these attributes; and (6) statistical analysis of the data obtained. As a result, it has been obtained a list of 62 learning environments (LMS or LP) characterized in terms of 15 key attributes in the management of assessment instruments, of which only 40% were included in these environments, while 7 of them (almost half) are incorporated in less than 25% of the environments.","PeriodicalId":111811,"journal":{"name":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the attributes (functions or characteristics) that learning platforms most frequently possess in terms of the way assessment instruments are managed or configured. Sixty-two platforms have been analyzed, and this analysis has allowed to identify 15 attributes associated with the management of assessment instruments. In order to fulfill the purpose of this study, the following steps were proposed: (1) web search of learning environments (either Learning Management Systems -LMS- or Learning Platforms -LP) used in the academic world; (2) filtering of the environments found, according to appropriate exclusion- inclusion criteria; (3) characterization of the dismissed LMS or LP according to their exclusion criteria; (4) identification and study of the attributes related to the management of assessment instruments or tests of each platform included in the study; (5) descriptive analysis of all the environments according to these attributes; and (6) statistical analysis of the data obtained. As a result, it has been obtained a list of 62 learning environments (LMS or LP) characterized in terms of 15 key attributes in the management of assessment instruments, of which only 40% were included in these environments, while 7 of them (almost half) are incorporated in less than 25% of the environments.
基于学业评估工具的学习平台分析
本文描述了学习平台在管理或配置评估工具的方式方面最经常拥有的属性(功能或特征)。已经分析了62个平台,并且该分析允许识别与评估工具管理相关的15个属性。为了实现本研究的目的,本研究提出以下步骤:(1)网络搜索学术界使用的学习环境(学习管理系统- lms -或学习平台- lp);(2)根据适当的排除-纳入标准对发现的环境进行过滤;(3)根据排除标准对被排除的LMS或LP进行定性;(4)确定和研究与研究所包括的每个平台的评估工具或测试的管理有关的属性;(5)根据这些属性对所有环境进行描述性分析;(6)对所得数据进行统计分析。结果,它获得了一份包含62个学习环境(LMS或LP)的列表,这些学习环境以评估工具管理中的15个关键属性为特征,其中只有40%被包括在这些环境中,而其中7个(几乎一半)被纳入不到25%的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信