BER performance comparison of IEEE 802.15.6 and IEEE 802.15.4 on PHY layer

Hakan Erdol, Hasan Yavuz Ozderya, Cem Sisman, T. Kayikçioglu, I. Kaya
{"title":"BER performance comparison of IEEE 802.15.6 and IEEE 802.15.4 on PHY layer","authors":"Hakan Erdol, Hasan Yavuz Ozderya, Cem Sisman, T. Kayikçioglu, I. Kaya","doi":"10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, Two communication protocol, IEEE 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) and IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE, which are designed for telemedicine field, have been studied. BER performances values of both standards are simulated using their individual physical layer profiles in Rayleigh fading and Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channels. The obtained performances are compared with each other. As a result of simulation in AWGN Channel, IEEE 802.15.4 communication protocol performs approximately 7 dB better in SNR - BER graph than IEEE 802.15.6 while in Rayleigh channel this difference increased up to 16 dB.","PeriodicalId":159773,"journal":{"name":"2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.7760839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In this paper, Two communication protocol, IEEE 802.15.6 Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) and IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE, which are designed for telemedicine field, have been studied. BER performances values of both standards are simulated using their individual physical layer profiles in Rayleigh fading and Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channels. The obtained performances are compared with each other. As a result of simulation in AWGN Channel, IEEE 802.15.4 communication protocol performs approximately 7 dB better in SNR - BER graph than IEEE 802.15.6 while in Rayleigh channel this difference increased up to 16 dB.
IEEE 802.15.6和IEEE 802.15.4物理层误码率性能比较
本文对专为远程医疗领域设计的IEEE 802.15.6无线体域网络(WBAN)和IEEE 802.15.4 ZigBEE两种通信协议进行了研究。在瑞利衰落和加性高斯白噪声(AWGN)信道中,利用各自的物理层剖面模拟了两种标准的误码率性能值。对得到的性能进行了比较。在AWGN信道下的仿真结果表明,IEEE 802.15.4通信协议在信噪比-误码率图上的性能比IEEE 802.15.6提高了约7 dB,而在瑞利信道下,这一差异增加到16 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信