The Traditional to Contemporary Spectrum of Models of Higher Education for Admission and Course Delivery

D. Kember, D. Hicks, Doris YP Doris YP, M. Prosser
{"title":"The Traditional to Contemporary Spectrum of Models of Higher Education for Admission and Course Delivery","authors":"D. Kember, D. Hicks, Doris YP Doris YP, M. Prosser","doi":"10.35745/eiet2021v01.01.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The admission of the more diverse student body in higher education has been facilitated by greater flexibility in teaching and learning mode of study and by permitting part-time study. This study aims to compare a hypothesised model on a set of presage variables relating to admission and mode of study; intermediate variables of age and year of study and measures of outcomes including GPA and attrition between a traditional university (N = 17,025) and a contemporary university (N = 8,911) using data from student records using structural equation modeling. Following testing and modification, the model for the traditional university (R-CFI = 0.959, SRMR = 0.035 and R-RMSEA = 0.059) was simpler than that for the contemporary university (R-CFI = 0.932, SRMR= 0.055, and R-RMSEA = 0.055). As universities have shifted across the spectrum from the traditional to contemporary models, the increased complexity has permitted the entry of a much wider range of students to higher education, but it is also led to increases in attrition.","PeriodicalId":165325,"journal":{"name":"Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2021v01.01.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The admission of the more diverse student body in higher education has been facilitated by greater flexibility in teaching and learning mode of study and by permitting part-time study. This study aims to compare a hypothesised model on a set of presage variables relating to admission and mode of study; intermediate variables of age and year of study and measures of outcomes including GPA and attrition between a traditional university (N = 17,025) and a contemporary university (N = 8,911) using data from student records using structural equation modeling. Following testing and modification, the model for the traditional university (R-CFI = 0.959, SRMR = 0.035 and R-RMSEA = 0.059) was simpler than that for the contemporary university (R-CFI = 0.932, SRMR= 0.055, and R-RMSEA = 0.055). As universities have shifted across the spectrum from the traditional to contemporary models, the increased complexity has permitted the entry of a much wider range of students to higher education, but it is also led to increases in attrition.
传统到现代的高等教育录取和课程交付模式
更灵活的教学和学习模式,以及允许非全日制学习,促进了高等教育录取更多样化的学生群体。本研究旨在比较关于入学和学习模式的一组预测变量的假设模型;年龄和学习年份的中间变量,以及传统大学(N = 17,025)和现代大学(N = 8,911)之间的结果测量,包括GPA和损失率,使用结构方程建模的学生记录数据。经过检验和修正,传统大学模型(R-CFI = 0.959, SRMR= 0.035, R-RMSEA = 0.059)比现代大学模型(R-CFI = 0.932, SRMR= 0.055, R-RMSEA = 0.055)更简单。随着大学从传统模式向现代模式的转变,复杂性的增加为更多的学生接受高等教育提供了机会,但也导致了人员流失的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信