Understanding engineering students for better recruitment strategies: a four-year study

M. Anderson-Rowland
{"title":"Understanding engineering students for better recruitment strategies: a four-year study","authors":"M. Anderson-Rowland","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2000.897619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering enrollments are declining. Interest in engineering is near a 20 year low among entering college freshmen. At the same time, the demand for engineering in the US is great, with foreign national students being brought to our country to help fill the gap. The situation calls for increased efforts in recruitment and retention. Since many university budgets are shrinking, accountability is expected for all invested funds, including those used for recruitment and retention. To better allocate resources to recruitment and retention efforts, a pilot survey was first administered to engineering freshman at ASU in the fall of 1994. This survey was refined and continued for an additional four years. Evaluations of the surveys in the first few years revealed some surprises. In the first survey, the primary reasons for attending ASU for an engineering degree was similar for both women and men: a good engineering school, close to home, and good weather. Surprising results, obtained from early surveys, showed that over fifty percent of the junior college transfers only decided on engineering after they attended college. Contrary to expectations, the data also showed that for underrepresented minority engineering students, it made no difference if they took the Introduction to Engineering class in their first or second semester. We look at the freshman engineering class longitudinally with four years of data. The paper examines if there have been any changes in recruitment and retention efforts during the last four years in response to information learned through the early surveys.","PeriodicalId":371740,"journal":{"name":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Building on A Century of Progress in Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37135)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2000.897619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Engineering enrollments are declining. Interest in engineering is near a 20 year low among entering college freshmen. At the same time, the demand for engineering in the US is great, with foreign national students being brought to our country to help fill the gap. The situation calls for increased efforts in recruitment and retention. Since many university budgets are shrinking, accountability is expected for all invested funds, including those used for recruitment and retention. To better allocate resources to recruitment and retention efforts, a pilot survey was first administered to engineering freshman at ASU in the fall of 1994. This survey was refined and continued for an additional four years. Evaluations of the surveys in the first few years revealed some surprises. In the first survey, the primary reasons for attending ASU for an engineering degree was similar for both women and men: a good engineering school, close to home, and good weather. Surprising results, obtained from early surveys, showed that over fifty percent of the junior college transfers only decided on engineering after they attended college. Contrary to expectations, the data also showed that for underrepresented minority engineering students, it made no difference if they took the Introduction to Engineering class in their first or second semester. We look at the freshman engineering class longitudinally with four years of data. The paper examines if there have been any changes in recruitment and retention efforts during the last four years in response to information learned through the early surveys.
了解工科学生以获得更好的招聘策略:一项为期四年的研究
工程专业的入学人数正在下降。大学新生对工程学的兴趣接近20年来的最低水平。与此同时,美国对工程学的需求很大,外国学生被带到美国来帮助填补这一空白。这种情况要求在征聘和留用方面作出更大努力。由于许多大学的预算都在缩减,所有投入的资金都需要问责,包括用于招聘和留用的资金。为了更好地将资源分配给招聘和留用工作,1994年秋季首次对亚利桑那州立大学的工科新生进行了试点调查。这项调查经过改进,又持续了四年。对最初几年调查的评估揭示了一些令人惊讶的情况。在第一次调查中,女性和男性去亚利桑那州立大学攻读工程学位的主要原因是相似的:好的工程学校,离家近,天气好。从早期调查中得出的令人惊讶的结果显示,超过50%的大专转学生在大学毕业后才决定转工程学专业。与预期相反,数据还显示,对于代表性不足的少数族裔工程专业学生来说,如果他们在第一学期或第二学期上了工程入门课程,结果并没有什么不同。我们用四年的数据纵向观察工程类大一新生。本文审查了在过去四年中,根据通过早期调查了解到的信息,在征聘和保留工作方面是否有任何变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信