The Pandemic Shut-In: Reactivating Wells Shut-In in Spring/Summer 2020 - The Impact on 10-Year Forecast and EUR Outlook: A Duvernay Oil Case Study

A. Renaud
{"title":"The Pandemic Shut-In: Reactivating Wells Shut-In in Spring/Summer 2020 - The Impact on 10-Year Forecast and EUR Outlook: A Duvernay Oil Case Study","authors":"A. Renaud","doi":"10.15530/urtec-2022-3721279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic forced Canadian oil and gas operators to cut crude oil production by almost 1 MMb/d in the first half of 2020 due to low oil prices driven by reduced demand. This study explores the forecast and EUR performance of unconventional horizontal oil wells producing from the Duvernay Formation in central Alberta that were shut-in versus those that continued to produce uninterrupted throughout the reduced production period. How were forecasted production and EURs impacted? Did the manner in which the wells were completed play a role? This paper investigates these questions and more in a regional case study of 95 unconventional Duvernay oil wells using public data and a fully automated, physio-statistical, predictive analytical production forecasting tool. The bases of the performance comparison were the results of a 10-year forecast and EUR outlook for the wells evaluated in January, 2020 before the production slow down, and then re-evaluated in January, 2021, 12 months later, after the wells that were shut-in were back on production. In general, wells that continued producing uninterrupted throughout the study period exhibited significantly improved forecast and EUR performance over wells that were shut-in. Analyzing the performance of the largest field (Cygnet with 32 wells), with respect to lateral length, the results pointed to shorter wells that were shut-in exhibiting the poorest performance, where the wells' EUR performance degraded by 7% on average. The proppant intensity study for the same wells told a similar story, with shut-in wells with smaller fracs exhibiting negligible EUR improvement (0.4%) compared to the other categories of wells, with respect to frac size and shut-in status. A proximity study investigated two pads, one with only shut-in wells and the other with only non-shut-in wells, with the results pointing to competitive drainage between individual wells despite the overall performance of a given pad being neutral. Copyright 2022, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC)","PeriodicalId":142652,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2022-3721279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced Canadian oil and gas operators to cut crude oil production by almost 1 MMb/d in the first half of 2020 due to low oil prices driven by reduced demand. This study explores the forecast and EUR performance of unconventional horizontal oil wells producing from the Duvernay Formation in central Alberta that were shut-in versus those that continued to produce uninterrupted throughout the reduced production period. How were forecasted production and EURs impacted? Did the manner in which the wells were completed play a role? This paper investigates these questions and more in a regional case study of 95 unconventional Duvernay oil wells using public data and a fully automated, physio-statistical, predictive analytical production forecasting tool. The bases of the performance comparison were the results of a 10-year forecast and EUR outlook for the wells evaluated in January, 2020 before the production slow down, and then re-evaluated in January, 2021, 12 months later, after the wells that were shut-in were back on production. In general, wells that continued producing uninterrupted throughout the study period exhibited significantly improved forecast and EUR performance over wells that were shut-in. Analyzing the performance of the largest field (Cygnet with 32 wells), with respect to lateral length, the results pointed to shorter wells that were shut-in exhibiting the poorest performance, where the wells' EUR performance degraded by 7% on average. The proppant intensity study for the same wells told a similar story, with shut-in wells with smaller fracs exhibiting negligible EUR improvement (0.4%) compared to the other categories of wells, with respect to frac size and shut-in status. A proximity study investigated two pads, one with only shut-in wells and the other with only non-shut-in wells, with the results pointing to competitive drainage between individual wells despite the overall performance of a given pad being neutral. Copyright 2022, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC)
大流行关井:2020年春夏重新启动关井——对10年预测和欧元前景的影响:以Duvernay石油为例研究
由于需求减少导致的低油价,2019冠状病毒病疫情迫使加拿大油气运营商在2020年上半年将原油产量削减近100万桶/天。本研究探讨了阿尔伯塔中部Duvernay地层非常规水平井的预测和EUR性能,这些水平井在减产期间被关井,而非常规水平井在减产期间继续不间断生产。预测产量和欧元是如何受到影响的?完井方式是否有影响?本文利用公共数据和全自动物理统计预测分析生产预测工具,对95口非常规Duvernay油井进行了区域案例研究,探讨了这些问题和更多问题。性能比较的基础是对2020年1月生产放缓之前的油井进行的10年预测和欧元前景的评估,然后在12个月后的2021年1月,在关闭的井恢复生产后进行重新评估。总的来说,在整个研究期间持续不间断生产的井,其预测和EUR性能都明显优于关井井。通过对最大油田(拥有32口井的Cygnet)的横向长度进行分析,结果表明,关闭的较短的井表现最差,这些井的EUR性能平均下降了7%。同一井的支撑剂强度研究也得出了类似的结论,与其他类型的井相比,在压裂尺寸和关井状态方面,较小压裂的关井井的EUR改善可以忽略不计(0.4%)。一项邻近研究调查了两个区块,一个区块只有关井,另一个区块只有未关井,结果表明,尽管给定区块的整体性能是中性的,但个别井之间的排液存在竞争。非常规资源技术会议(URTeC)版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信