The Emergency Management of Migration and Agricultural Workforce during the Pandemic The Contradictory Outcomes of the 2020 Amnesty Law

Emanuela Dal Zotto, Martina Lo Cascio, V. Piro
{"title":"The Emergency Management of Migration and Agricultural Workforce during the Pandemic\n The Contradictory Outcomes of the 2020 Amnesty Law","authors":"Emanuela Dal Zotto, Martina Lo Cascio, V. Piro","doi":"10.30687/978-88-6969-532-2/014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter aims to illustrate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and, in particular, of the of amnesty law passed by the Italian government in May 2020 for migrants working in agriculture, highlighting the continuity of the latter measure with the previous policies regulating migration and agricultural labour. For decades, these policies have managed both international migrations and domestic mobility of the seasonal labour force through an emergency approach. The chapter resorts on data collected through statistics, interviews and participant observation inside informal settlements in the South of Italy. In conclusion, we argue that the health emergency accelerates the resort to administrative and bureaucratic emergency practices in the management of migrations, thus contributing to the reproduction of an emergency frame, that relegates labourers to the role of ‘victims of exploitation’, and at the same time regulates their possibility of movement and their employment opportunities.","PeriodicalId":330863,"journal":{"name":"Stuck and Exploited\n Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Italy Between Exclusion, Discrimination and Struggles","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stuck and Exploited\n Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Italy Between Exclusion, Discrimination and Struggles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-532-2/014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The chapter aims to illustrate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and, in particular, of the of amnesty law passed by the Italian government in May 2020 for migrants working in agriculture, highlighting the continuity of the latter measure with the previous policies regulating migration and agricultural labour. For decades, these policies have managed both international migrations and domestic mobility of the seasonal labour force through an emergency approach. The chapter resorts on data collected through statistics, interviews and participant observation inside informal settlements in the South of Italy. In conclusion, we argue that the health emergency accelerates the resort to administrative and bureaucratic emergency practices in the management of migrations, thus contributing to the reproduction of an emergency frame, that relegates labourers to the role of ‘victims of exploitation’, and at the same time regulates their possibility of movement and their employment opportunities.
大流行期间移民和农业劳动力的紧急管理2020年《大赦法》相互矛盾的结果
本章旨在说明2019冠状病毒病大流行的影响,特别是意大利政府于2020年5月通过的大赦法对从事农业工作的移徙者的影响,并强调后者的措施与以前规范移徙和农业劳动力的政策的连续性。几十年来,这些政策通过紧急办法管理了国际移徙和季节性劳动力的国内流动。本章采用通过统计、访谈和参与观察在意大利南部非正式定居点收集的数据。最后,我们认为,卫生紧急情况加速了在移民管理中诉诸行政和官僚紧急做法,从而促成了紧急框架的再现,使劳动者沦为“剥削受害者”的角色,同时又限制了他们流动的可能性和就业机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信