Security-driven metrics and models for efficient evaluation of logic encryption schemes

Yinghua Hu, Vivek V. Menon, A. Schmidt, Joshua S. Monson, M. French, P. Nuzzo
{"title":"Security-driven metrics and models for efficient evaluation of logic encryption schemes","authors":"Yinghua Hu, Vivek V. Menon, A. Schmidt, Joshua S. Monson, M. French, P. Nuzzo","doi":"10.1145/3359986.3361207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in logic encryption over the last decade has resulted in various techniques to prevent different security threats such as Trojan insertion, intellectual property leakage, and reverse engineering. However, there is little agreement on a uniform set of metrics and models to efficiently assess the achieved security level and the trade-offs between security and overhead. This paper addresses the above challenges by relying on a general logic encryption model that can encompass all the existing techniques, and a uniform set of metrics that can capture multiple, possibly conflicting, security concerns. We apply our modeling approach to four state-of-the-art encryption techniques, showing that it enables fast and accurate evaluation of design trade-offs, average prediction errors that are at least 2× smaller than previous approaches, and the evaluation of compound encryption methods.","PeriodicalId":331904,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th ACM-IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for System Design","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th ACM-IEEE International Conference on Formal Methods and Models for System Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3359986.3361207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Research in logic encryption over the last decade has resulted in various techniques to prevent different security threats such as Trojan insertion, intellectual property leakage, and reverse engineering. However, there is little agreement on a uniform set of metrics and models to efficiently assess the achieved security level and the trade-offs between security and overhead. This paper addresses the above challenges by relying on a general logic encryption model that can encompass all the existing techniques, and a uniform set of metrics that can capture multiple, possibly conflicting, security concerns. We apply our modeling approach to four state-of-the-art encryption techniques, showing that it enables fast and accurate evaluation of design trade-offs, average prediction errors that are at least 2× smaller than previous approaches, and the evaluation of compound encryption methods.
用于逻辑加密方案有效评估的安全驱动度量和模型
在过去十年中,对逻辑加密的研究已经产生了各种技术来防止不同的安全威胁,例如特洛伊木马插入、知识产权泄漏和逆向工程。然而,对于一组统一的度量和模型来有效地评估已实现的安全级别以及安全性和开销之间的权衡,几乎没有达成一致。本文解决了上述挑战,依靠的是可以包含所有现有技术的通用逻辑加密模型,以及一组可以捕获多个(可能相互冲突的)安全关注点的统一指标。我们将我们的建模方法应用于四种最先进的加密技术,表明它能够快速准确地评估设计权衡,平均预测误差至少比以前的方法小2倍,以及评估复合加密方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信