Transgender Rights in Accordance with Civil & Sharia Law: Malaysia and Asean Perspectives
Wan Amir Azlan Wan Haniff, S. M. Atan, R. M. Yusoff, R. M. Salleh, Zulhazmi Yusof
{"title":"Transgender Rights in Accordance with Civil & Sharia Law: Malaysia and Asean Perspectives","authors":"Wan Amir Azlan Wan Haniff, S. M. Atan, R. M. Yusoff, R. M. Salleh, Zulhazmi Yusof","doi":"10.6007/IJARBSS/V11-I3/8862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The transgender term is used to illustrate a broad-spectrum of identities and experiences, inclusive to pre-operative, post-operative, and non-operative transsexual people; male and female cross-dressers; intersexed individuals; and men and women, whose appearance or features are recognised to be gender atypical. Transgender people are often exposed to violence and legally sanctioned discriminant on a daily basis in Malaysia, but it does not prevent them from growing in number. Objective: This article analyses the legal rights of transgender in Malaysia based on civil and Sharia law available with reference to international and ASEAN perspectives in consideration of the possibility for cross‐ jurisdictional study. Method: This qualitative research adopts primary and secondary data benefitted from scientific report analysis and literature including statutes, law cases & papers on transgender. These details were analysed by legal interpretation and comparative assessment. Result: The research reveals that there is an absence of definition of transgender in any Malaysia legislation, but that does not prevent the transprejudice and legally sanctioned discriminant in every way possible e.g., men who appear as women. Still, with respect to healthcare settings, medical doctors in Malaysia conveyed relatively low intent to discriminate against transgender patients. In ASEAN perspective, notwithstanding the endorsement of ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, it lacks the capability to enforce its provisions in cases of transgression. Conclusion and recommendation: It is a long way off for Malaysia to recognise the rights of transgender due to the fact that the fundamental principles of the country mostly based on Sharia law and Islamic value. Nevertheless, there is path for intersex individual who according to Islamic jurists is not categorised as transgender, thus deserve to not be discriminated in all forms. Hence, the paper recommends Malaysian International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 1307 authority to endeavour to thoroughly define transgender from both civil and Sharia law point of view.","PeriodicalId":333260,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/V11-I3/8862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The transgender term is used to illustrate a broad-spectrum of identities and experiences, inclusive to pre-operative, post-operative, and non-operative transsexual people; male and female cross-dressers; intersexed individuals; and men and women, whose appearance or features are recognised to be gender atypical. Transgender people are often exposed to violence and legally sanctioned discriminant on a daily basis in Malaysia, but it does not prevent them from growing in number. Objective: This article analyses the legal rights of transgender in Malaysia based on civil and Sharia law available with reference to international and ASEAN perspectives in consideration of the possibility for cross‐ jurisdictional study. Method: This qualitative research adopts primary and secondary data benefitted from scientific report analysis and literature including statutes, law cases & papers on transgender. These details were analysed by legal interpretation and comparative assessment. Result: The research reveals that there is an absence of definition of transgender in any Malaysia legislation, but that does not prevent the transprejudice and legally sanctioned discriminant in every way possible e.g., men who appear as women. Still, with respect to healthcare settings, medical doctors in Malaysia conveyed relatively low intent to discriminate against transgender patients. In ASEAN perspective, notwithstanding the endorsement of ASEAN Human Rights Declaration, it lacks the capability to enforce its provisions in cases of transgression. Conclusion and recommendation: It is a long way off for Malaysia to recognise the rights of transgender due to the fact that the fundamental principles of the country mostly based on Sharia law and Islamic value. Nevertheless, there is path for intersex individual who according to Islamic jurists is not categorised as transgender, thus deserve to not be discriminated in all forms. Hence, the paper recommends Malaysian International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol. 1 1 , No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990 © 2021 HRMARS 1307 authority to endeavour to thoroughly define transgender from both civil and Sharia law point of view.
根据民法和伊斯兰教法的跨性别权利:马来西亚和东盟的观点
背景:跨性别一词被用来描述广泛的身份和经历,包括术前、术后和非手术变性人;男女异装癖者;两性人个人;男性和女性,他们的外表或特征被认为是非典型性别。在马来西亚,跨性别者经常遭受暴力和法律上的歧视,但这并没有阻止他们的数量不断增长。目的:本文以马来西亚的民法和伊斯兰教法为基础,参考国际和东盟的观点,分析跨性别者的法律权利,并考虑跨司法管辖区研究的可能性。方法:本定性研究采用科学报告分析的一手和二手资料,并结合文献,包括有关跨性别者的法规、法律案例和论文。通过法律解释和比较评价对这些细节进行了分析。结果:研究显示,在马来西亚的任何立法中都没有对跨性别者的定义,但这并不能阻止跨性别者的偏见和法律上的歧视,例如,以女性的身份出现的男性。然而,在医疗环境方面,马来西亚的医生表示歧视变性病人的意愿相对较低。从东盟的角度来看,尽管认可了《东盟人权宣言》,但它缺乏在违反情况下执行其规定的能力。结论与建议:马来西亚要承认跨性别者的权利还有很长的路要走,因为这个国家的基本原则主要是基于伊斯兰教法和伊斯兰价值观。然而,根据伊斯兰法学家的说法,阴阳人没有被归类为跨性别者,因此不应该受到任何形式的歧视。因此,本文建议《马来西亚国际商业与社会科学学术研究杂志》Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021, E-ISSN: 2222-6990©2021 HRMARS 1307权威机构努力从民法和伊斯兰教法的角度彻底定义跨性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。