Talking about the same but different? Understanding social movement and trade union cooperation through social movement and industrial relations theories

Sabrina Zajak, Giulia Gortanutti, Johanna Lauber, A. Nikolas
{"title":"Talking about the same but different? Understanding social movement and trade union cooperation through social movement and industrial relations theories","authors":"Sabrina Zajak, Giulia Gortanutti, Johanna Lauber, A. Nikolas","doi":"10.3224/INDBEZ.V25I2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of continuing political, social, and economic crises, trade unions in most European countries are seen as weakened, protest as having little influence, and the solidarity between European populations as damaged. Under these circumstances, scientists and practitioners have placed hope in the cooperation of social movements and trade unions in order to revitalise trade unions and achieve common goals. However, the conditions for forming alliances between trade unions and social movement organisations have, thus far, been primarily researched, and partially theorised, from the point of view of different disciplines. In doing so, approaches that emphasise the strategic alignment with resources and context diverge from approaches that highlight the relevance and necessity of shared ideologies or identities. This contribution aims to bring existing approaches from movement and industrial relations research into dialogue with each other and calls for a further integration of both perspectives. It contributes to a more holistic understanding of joint movement and trade union action current concepts such as social movement unionism cannot provide. It uses two examples to show that instrumental, strategy-driven modes and identity-based, culturally-driven modes of cooperation are not contradictory. There are situations in which strategic decisions on resources and political influence are more decisive than ideological proximity and vice versa. These findings are of social and scientific relevance for understanding mechanisms of solidarity construction and processes of bridging differences even in increasingly fragmented and unequal societies.","PeriodicalId":408151,"journal":{"name":"Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/INDBEZ.V25I2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In the context of continuing political, social, and economic crises, trade unions in most European countries are seen as weakened, protest as having little influence, and the solidarity between European populations as damaged. Under these circumstances, scientists and practitioners have placed hope in the cooperation of social movements and trade unions in order to revitalise trade unions and achieve common goals. However, the conditions for forming alliances between trade unions and social movement organisations have, thus far, been primarily researched, and partially theorised, from the point of view of different disciplines. In doing so, approaches that emphasise the strategic alignment with resources and context diverge from approaches that highlight the relevance and necessity of shared ideologies or identities. This contribution aims to bring existing approaches from movement and industrial relations research into dialogue with each other and calls for a further integration of both perspectives. It contributes to a more holistic understanding of joint movement and trade union action current concepts such as social movement unionism cannot provide. It uses two examples to show that instrumental, strategy-driven modes and identity-based, culturally-driven modes of cooperation are not contradictory. There are situations in which strategic decisions on resources and political influence are more decisive than ideological proximity and vice versa. These findings are of social and scientific relevance for understanding mechanisms of solidarity construction and processes of bridging differences even in increasingly fragmented and unequal societies.
说的是相同但不同的东西?通过社会运动和劳资关系理论了解社会运动和工会合作
在持续的政治、社会和经济危机的背景下,大多数欧洲国家的工会被视为被削弱了,抗议几乎没有影响,欧洲人民之间的团结被破坏了。在这种情况下,科学家和实践者寄希望于社会运动和工会的合作,以振兴工会和实现共同目标。然而,迄今为止,工会和社会运动组织之间形成联盟的条件主要是从不同学科的角度进行研究和部分理论化的。在这样做的过程中,强调与资源和环境的战略一致性的方法与强调共享意识形态或身份的相关性和必要性的方法不同。这一贡献旨在将运动和工业关系研究的现有方法相互对话,并呼吁进一步整合这两种观点。它有助于更全面地理解联合运动和工会行动,目前的概念,如社会运动工会主义不能提供。它用两个例子来表明工具性的、战略驱动的合作模式和基于身份的、文化驱动的合作模式并不矛盾。在某些情况下,关于资源和政治影响的战略决策比意识形态接近更具有决定性,反之亦然。这些发现具有社会和科学意义,有助于理解即使在日益分散和不平等的社会中建立团结的机制和弥合差异的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信