{"title":"Loosening the Need-Concept Tie","authors":"M. Queloz","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198868705.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter on E. J. Craig’s genealogy of the concept of knowledge aims to bring out four attractive features of the method. First, by examining its alleged incompatibility with knowledge-first epistemology, it is shown how genealogy allows one to treat as arising separately what in reality has to arise together, so that one can isolate a concept’s practical contribution even when it could not have arisen in isolation. Second, genealogy allows one to consider a concept’s development out of prior forms that more clearly display its relation to human needs even when these prior forms could not have been realized in history, for reasons that the genealogy itself brings out. Third, genealogy reveals practical pressures driving the de-instrumentalization of concepts, the process whereby concepts shed the traces of their origins in the needs of individual concept-users. And finally, the method allows one to assess and reconcile competing accounts of concepts.","PeriodicalId":207905,"journal":{"name":"The Practical Origins of Ideas","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Practical Origins of Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198868705.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter on E. J. Craig’s genealogy of the concept of knowledge aims to bring out four attractive features of the method. First, by examining its alleged incompatibility with knowledge-first epistemology, it is shown how genealogy allows one to treat as arising separately what in reality has to arise together, so that one can isolate a concept’s practical contribution even when it could not have arisen in isolation. Second, genealogy allows one to consider a concept’s development out of prior forms that more clearly display its relation to human needs even when these prior forms could not have been realized in history, for reasons that the genealogy itself brings out. Third, genealogy reveals practical pressures driving the de-instrumentalization of concepts, the process whereby concepts shed the traces of their origins in the needs of individual concept-users. And finally, the method allows one to assess and reconcile competing accounts of concepts.
E. J. Craig关于知识概念的谱系的这一章旨在揭示该方法的四个吸引人的特点。首先,通过检验所谓的与知识优先认识论的不相容,它显示了谱系学如何允许人们将现实中必须一起产生的东西视为单独产生的,因此人们可以孤立一个概念的实际贡献,即使它不可能孤立产生。其次,家谱允许人们考虑一个概念从先前形式的发展,这些形式更清楚地显示了它与人类需求的关系,即使这些先前形式在历史上不可能实现,因为家谱本身带来的原因。第三,谱系揭示了推动概念去工具化的实际压力,即概念在个体概念使用者的需求中摆脱其起源痕迹的过程。最后,该方法允许人们评估和调和概念的相互矛盾的说法。