Decentralisation and Covid-19

Mikel Erkoreka, Mireia Grau Creus, Mario Kölling
{"title":"Decentralisation and Covid-19","authors":"Mikel Erkoreka, Mireia Grau Creus, Mario Kölling","doi":"10.4324/9781003166771-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyses how the Spanish governance system and territorial model responded to the stress test generated by the Covid-19 pandemic. The abrupt irruption of the health crisis took the Spanish political and institutional system into a crisis mode. The initial reactions were based on ‘institutionally automatic-pilot reactions’: a hierarchical response that centralised all powers in a single decision-making unit by declaring the state of alarm. Under the state of alarm, the central government assumed some powers of the autonomous communities (ACs). However, the growing political contestation and the logistical inefficiencies derived from recentralising brought about a change of perspective. From May 2020, the ACs gradually recovered their health powers and were given a voice within the pandemic’s decision-making processes. The Covid-19 crisis has unveiled that Spain’s decentralised political system, for years assumed to be fast and furiously running into a federal track, had actually a structural speed limit: an unfitted shared rule and a very-easy-to-dismantle self-rule. Although central government’s approach on the role of the ACs in state-wide decision-making processes changed during the crisis, whether this change, based on political attitudes and interests, can generate a stable institutional context is an issue to be dealt with in the future. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.","PeriodicalId":130880,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter analyses how the Spanish governance system and territorial model responded to the stress test generated by the Covid-19 pandemic. The abrupt irruption of the health crisis took the Spanish political and institutional system into a crisis mode. The initial reactions were based on ‘institutionally automatic-pilot reactions’: a hierarchical response that centralised all powers in a single decision-making unit by declaring the state of alarm. Under the state of alarm, the central government assumed some powers of the autonomous communities (ACs). However, the growing political contestation and the logistical inefficiencies derived from recentralising brought about a change of perspective. From May 2020, the ACs gradually recovered their health powers and were given a voice within the pandemic’s decision-making processes. The Covid-19 crisis has unveiled that Spain’s decentralised political system, for years assumed to be fast and furiously running into a federal track, had actually a structural speed limit: an unfitted shared rule and a very-easy-to-dismantle self-rule. Although central government’s approach on the role of the ACs in state-wide decision-making processes changed during the crisis, whether this change, based on political attitudes and interests, can generate a stable institutional context is an issue to be dealt with in the future. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.
权力下放与Covid-19
本章分析了西班牙的治理体系和领土模式如何应对新冠肺炎大流行带来的压力测试。卫生危机的突然爆发使西班牙的政治和制度体系陷入危机模式。最初的反应是基于“制度上的自动驾驶反应”:一种等级反应,通过宣布警报状态将所有权力集中在一个决策单元中。在紧急状态下,中央政府接管了自治区的部分权力。然而,由于重新集中而引起的日益加剧的政治争论和后勤效率低下,使人们改变了看法。从2020年5月起,acc逐渐恢复了卫生权力,并在大流行的决策过程中获得了发言权。新冠肺炎危机揭示出,多年来被认为快速而疯狂地奔向联邦轨道的西班牙分散式政治体系,实际上存在结构性的速度限制:不合适的共同规则和非常容易废除的自治。尽管在危机期间,中央政府对ACs在全州决策过程中的作用的态度发生了变化,但这种基于政治态度和利益的改变能否产生稳定的制度环境,是未来需要解决的问题。©2022选择和编辑事项,Nico Steytler。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信