Saurabh Biswas, Chrissi A. Antonopoulos, T. Seiple, C. Bakker, Michael Walsh, A. Coleman
{"title":"Developing a Roadmap for Tracking Sustainability in Bioenergy Transitions","authors":"Saurabh Biswas, Chrissi A. Antonopoulos, T. Seiple, C. Bakker, Michael Walsh, A. Coleman","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainability of any transition is contingent on both the processes and outcomes. To measure if a particular program or project is sustainable, a heterogenous set of methods and indicators are required to evaluate processes and outcomes at the same time. In this paper, we characterize the parameters of programmatic evaluation and propose a sustainability tracking roadmap for bioenergy conversions. Drawing from the state of scholarship on triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability, multi-dimensional systems view of sustainability transitions and bioenergy, the breadth of sustainability questions are framed. Comparing to a selection of commonly used measurement and evaluation approaches, including several of those funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), a profile of coverage for sustainability issues is generated. We find that nearly all of the current approaches focus mostly on planetary or regional-scale questions and on project-efficiency metrics. A significant gap exists in capturing intermediate-scale phenomenon and social dynamics of interventions. This creates blind spots in capturing justice, equity, and economic futures at local scales. The proposed sustainability tracking roadmap offer a mixed-methods heuristic to design and implement a suite of indicators and data processes for TBL accounting. Operational questions of integrating evaluation with planning, data use and production, and stakeholder roles and capacities are discussed.","PeriodicalId":180420,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS55053.2022.10227136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sustainability of any transition is contingent on both the processes and outcomes. To measure if a particular program or project is sustainable, a heterogenous set of methods and indicators are required to evaluate processes and outcomes at the same time. In this paper, we characterize the parameters of programmatic evaluation and propose a sustainability tracking roadmap for bioenergy conversions. Drawing from the state of scholarship on triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability, multi-dimensional systems view of sustainability transitions and bioenergy, the breadth of sustainability questions are framed. Comparing to a selection of commonly used measurement and evaluation approaches, including several of those funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), a profile of coverage for sustainability issues is generated. We find that nearly all of the current approaches focus mostly on planetary or regional-scale questions and on project-efficiency metrics. A significant gap exists in capturing intermediate-scale phenomenon and social dynamics of interventions. This creates blind spots in capturing justice, equity, and economic futures at local scales. The proposed sustainability tracking roadmap offer a mixed-methods heuristic to design and implement a suite of indicators and data processes for TBL accounting. Operational questions of integrating evaluation with planning, data use and production, and stakeholder roles and capacities are discussed.