Biodiversity on private land: Lessons from the Mid-Murray Valley in South-eastern Australia

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Wesley S. Ward, Jennifer Bond, Louise Burge, John Conallin, Colin (Max) Finlayson, Damian Michael, Shelley Scoullar, Michael Vanderzee, Adam Wettenhall
{"title":"Biodiversity on private land: Lessons from the Mid-Murray Valley in South-eastern Australia","authors":"Wesley S. Ward,&nbsp;Jennifer Bond,&nbsp;Louise Burge,&nbsp;John Conallin,&nbsp;Colin (Max) Finlayson,&nbsp;Damian Michael,&nbsp;Shelley Scoullar,&nbsp;Michael Vanderzee,&nbsp;Adam Wettenhall","doi":"10.1111/emr.12560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, we use an autoethnographic approach to explore relationships between landholders and government agencies and natural resource management projects. We use this exploration to argue for a holistic, collaborative approach to decision making around the implementation of biodiversity conservation on private and public land. This approach aligns with principles underpinning reconciliation ecology, which emphasises the inclusion of grass-roots communities for promoting biodiversity conservation in human-dominated landscapes where approaches to the management of natural resources may be contested. We present three projects (Environmental Champions; Fencing Incentive programmes; Plains-wanderer programme) and other research from the Mid-Murray Valley region of southern New South Wales to highlight the positive and negative aspects of relationships between landholders and others in natural resource management. We argue that for a more collaborative approach; we need to build relationships based on understanding, trust, respect, ownership and partnerships between rural communities, landholders, education and research institutions and government agencies as recognised in reconciliation ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 2","pages":"175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/emr.12560","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we use an autoethnographic approach to explore relationships between landholders and government agencies and natural resource management projects. We use this exploration to argue for a holistic, collaborative approach to decision making around the implementation of biodiversity conservation on private and public land. This approach aligns with principles underpinning reconciliation ecology, which emphasises the inclusion of grass-roots communities for promoting biodiversity conservation in human-dominated landscapes where approaches to the management of natural resources may be contested. We present three projects (Environmental Champions; Fencing Incentive programmes; Plains-wanderer programme) and other research from the Mid-Murray Valley region of southern New South Wales to highlight the positive and negative aspects of relationships between landholders and others in natural resource management. We argue that for a more collaborative approach; we need to build relationships based on understanding, trust, respect, ownership and partnerships between rural communities, landholders, education and research institutions and government agencies as recognised in reconciliation ecology.

Abstract Image

私人土地上的生物多样性:来自澳大利亚东南部中默里山谷的经验教训
在这篇文章中,我们使用一种自我民族志的方法来探索土地所有者和政府机构以及自然资源管理项目之间的关系。我们利用这一探索来论证在私人和公共土地上实施生物多样性保护的一种整体的、协作的决策方法。这种方法与和解生态学的基本原则相一致,和解生态学强调在人类主导的景观中纳入基层社区,以促进生物多样性保护,在这些景观中,自然资源管理的方法可能会受到质疑。我们提出了三个项目(环境冠军;击剑奖励计划;平原流浪者计划)和新南威尔士州南部中默里河谷地区的其他研究,以突出土地所有者和其他人在自然资源管理中关系的积极和消极方面。我们认为,对于一种更具协作性的方法;我们需要在农村社区、土地所有者、教育和研究机构以及政府机构之间建立基于理解、信任、尊重、所有权和伙伴关系的关系,这是和解生态学所认可的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Management & Restoration
Ecological Management & Restoration Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world. Topic areas: Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信