Mapping of literature on safety knowledge research using ScientoPy and VOSviewer

Khairul Hafezad Abdullah
{"title":"Mapping of literature on safety knowledge research using ScientoPy and VOSviewer","authors":"Khairul Hafezad Abdullah","doi":"10.56916/jmsss.v1i1.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study scope that emphasises safety knowledge is essential for providing individuals with the information they need to work safely and follow existing safety regulations. This study examines the evolution of safety knowledge research based on publications productivity, subject areas, proactive authors, energetic research institutions, and the primary authors’ keywords. This study deliberates the bibliometric analysis of previous publications pertinent to safety research by using the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. A graphical depiction of bibliometric results is attainable using the ScientoPy and VOSviewer. This study found a significant increase in safety knowledge publications, with WoS publications outpacing Scopus in growth explicitly in 2012. “Food Science and Technology” has been the most thoroughly researched field. Also, this study revealed that “Food Science and Technology” became the primary focus of safety knowledge research. Osaili, T.M., and Jevnik, M., are acknowledged as proactive contributors to safety knowledge research. Jordan University of Science and Technology in Irbid, Jordan, dominated the number of publications. This study discovered that content analysis through the analysis of authors’ keywords is principally focused on “food safety”, “attitudes”, and “practises”, which are closely related and provide a meaningful relationship. This bibliometric analysis concludes that the safety knowledge research output is considerable. This bibliometric analysis provides an overview of safety knowledge research, which may accommodate practitioners and researchers interested in expanding or discovering a new understanding of this subject and establishing robust safety knowledge research theories and practices.","PeriodicalId":367770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Metrics Studies and Social Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Metrics Studies and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56916/jmsss.v1i1.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A study scope that emphasises safety knowledge is essential for providing individuals with the information they need to work safely and follow existing safety regulations. This study examines the evolution of safety knowledge research based on publications productivity, subject areas, proactive authors, energetic research institutions, and the primary authors’ keywords. This study deliberates the bibliometric analysis of previous publications pertinent to safety research by using the Scopus and Web of Science (WoS) databases. A graphical depiction of bibliometric results is attainable using the ScientoPy and VOSviewer. This study found a significant increase in safety knowledge publications, with WoS publications outpacing Scopus in growth explicitly in 2012. “Food Science and Technology” has been the most thoroughly researched field. Also, this study revealed that “Food Science and Technology” became the primary focus of safety knowledge research. Osaili, T.M., and Jevnik, M., are acknowledged as proactive contributors to safety knowledge research. Jordan University of Science and Technology in Irbid, Jordan, dominated the number of publications. This study discovered that content analysis through the analysis of authors’ keywords is principally focused on “food safety”, “attitudes”, and “practises”, which are closely related and provide a meaningful relationship. This bibliometric analysis concludes that the safety knowledge research output is considerable. This bibliometric analysis provides an overview of safety knowledge research, which may accommodate practitioners and researchers interested in expanding or discovering a new understanding of this subject and establishing robust safety knowledge research theories and practices.
利用ScientoPy和VOSviewer绘制安全知识研究文献图
强调安全知识的研究范围对于向个人提供安全工作和遵守现有安全法规所需的信息至关重要。本研究基于出版物生产率、学科领域、主动作者、活跃研究机构和主要作者的关键词考察了安全知识研究的演变。本研究利用Scopus和Web of Science (WoS)数据库对安全性研究相关文献进行计量分析。使用ScientoPy和VOSviewer可以实现文献计量结果的图形化描述。本研究发现安全知识出版物显著增加,2012年WoS出版物的增长明显超过Scopus。“食品科学与技术”一直是研究最彻底的领域。同时,“食品科学与技术”成为安全知识研究的主要焦点。Osaili, t.m.和Jevnik, M,被认为是安全知识研究的积极贡献者。位于约旦伊尔比德的约旦科技大学发表论文数量居首位。本研究发现,通过对作者关键词的分析,内容分析主要集中在“食品安全”、“态度”和“实践”三个方面,这三个方面密切相关,并提供了有意义的关系。通过文献计量分析,得出安全知识研究成果可观的结论。这一文献计量分析提供了安全知识研究的概述,这可能适合有兴趣扩展或发现对这一主题的新理解并建立健全的安全知识研究理论和实践的从业者和研究人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信