Perception of dental anatomy among dental students, dental practitioners, and dental academicians: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study

Divya Mandalaywala, Jayasankar P. Pillai, Pooja C Monpara, Tejas Gadhavi
{"title":"Perception of dental anatomy among dental students, dental practitioners, and dental academicians: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study","authors":"Divya Mandalaywala, Jayasankar P. Pillai, Pooja C Monpara, Tejas Gadhavi","doi":"10.25259/jade_2_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe subject of dental anatomy is basically very important both from academic and practical points of view in dentistry. The present study was designed to determine the extent of variations in the perception of dental anatomy among dental students, dental practitioners, and dental academicians.\n\n\n\nThe questionnaire consisted of 15 closed-ended questions related to dental anatomy. There were 11 dichotomous questions with “yes” and “no” options and four multiple-choice questions. The questions were validated by experts and the questionnaire was submitted in Google form to the targeted respondent’s groups through WhatsApp and Emails. The responses received over 2 months were considered for statistical analysis. The Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test was performed to test the difference in the responses between the groups of respondents.\n\n\n\nThe results of the study revealed that nearly 62–92% of the respondents gave an affirmative response to the dichotomous questions (Q. No. 1–11). The digital Vernier caliper was the most preferred instrument to measure the tooth dimensions and the FDI system was the most preferred nomenclature system among the respondents (66.7%) followed by the Palmer-Zsigmondy system (18.2%). Almost 50% of the respondents opted for conservative dentistry and endodontics as the clinical specialty in dentistry, where the knowledge of dental anatomy has its greatest application.\n\n\n\nThere was no significant difference in the opinion about dental anatomy between the undergraduate dental students and the professionals except for their opinion regarding the course curriculum.\n","PeriodicalId":163007,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academy of Dental Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academy of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jade_2_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of dental anatomy is basically very important both from academic and practical points of view in dentistry. The present study was designed to determine the extent of variations in the perception of dental anatomy among dental students, dental practitioners, and dental academicians. The questionnaire consisted of 15 closed-ended questions related to dental anatomy. There were 11 dichotomous questions with “yes” and “no” options and four multiple-choice questions. The questions were validated by experts and the questionnaire was submitted in Google form to the targeted respondent’s groups through WhatsApp and Emails. The responses received over 2 months were considered for statistical analysis. The Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test was performed to test the difference in the responses between the groups of respondents. The results of the study revealed that nearly 62–92% of the respondents gave an affirmative response to the dichotomous questions (Q. No. 1–11). The digital Vernier caliper was the most preferred instrument to measure the tooth dimensions and the FDI system was the most preferred nomenclature system among the respondents (66.7%) followed by the Palmer-Zsigmondy system (18.2%). Almost 50% of the respondents opted for conservative dentistry and endodontics as the clinical specialty in dentistry, where the knowledge of dental anatomy has its greatest application. There was no significant difference in the opinion about dental anatomy between the undergraduate dental students and the professionals except for their opinion regarding the course curriculum.
牙科学生、牙科从业者和牙科学者对牙科解剖学的认知:一项基于问卷的横断面研究
无论从学术角度还是从实践角度来看,口腔解剖学在牙科中都是非常重要的。本研究旨在确定牙科学生、牙科从业人员和牙科学者对牙科解剖学认知的差异程度。问卷由15个与口腔解剖相关的封闭式问题组成。共有11道带有“是”和“否”选项的二分题和4道选择题。问题经过专家验证,问卷以谷歌形式通过WhatsApp和email发送给目标被调查者群体。对超过2个月的回复进行统计分析。采用Kruskal-Wallis非参数检验来检验被调查者组间反应的差异。研究结果显示,近62-92%的受访者对二分法问题(Q. 1-11)给出了肯定的回答。数字游标卡尺是最受欢迎的测量牙齿尺寸的仪器,FDI系统是最受欢迎的命名系统(66.7%),其次是Palmer-Zsigmondy系统(18.2%)。近50%的受访者选择保守牙科和牙髓学作为牙科的临床专业,其中牙齿解剖知识有最大的应用。除对课程设置的看法外,口腔专业本科学生对口腔解剖学的看法与专业专业学生无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信