Ulàpeitök: Using Bribri Indigenous Teachings to Develop a Ph.D. Research Methodology

O. Sylvester, A. Segura
{"title":"Ulàpeitök: Using Bribri Indigenous Teachings to Develop a Ph.D. Research Methodology","authors":"O. Sylvester, A. Segura","doi":"10.15402/ESJ.V3I2.336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there is a growing interest in Indigenous research, education regarding how to put Indigenous research into practice is not often part of academic training. To increase the awareness of how Indigenous methodologies can be applied to academic research, we describe how we used Bribri Indigenous teachings to develop a Ph.D. research methodology for a food security project in Costa Rica. Our research approach was based on a Bribri concept related to cooperation, ulàpeitök; this concept guided our work and helped to reduce the negative consequences associated with conventional research with Indigenous people (e.g., extractive practices, reinforcement of gender inequality, misrepresenting cultural information). We identified three considerations that may be useful for other scholars applying Indigenous teachings to academic research: 1) build flexibility into the entire research program, 2) ensure that community-level and university-level researchers are willing to play multiple roles beyond those associated with conventional research, and 3) proceed with an ethic of friendship. Our work is relevant to scholars working in Indigenous/non-Indigenous research teams that aim to transform conventional research approaches to ensure that they support human rights, equity, and cultural continuity. In Costa Rica, our research is specifically relevant to building wider acceptance of Indigenous methodologies in higher education.","PeriodicalId":202523,"journal":{"name":"Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15402/ESJ.V3I2.336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there is a growing interest in Indigenous research, education regarding how to put Indigenous research into practice is not often part of academic training. To increase the awareness of how Indigenous methodologies can be applied to academic research, we describe how we used Bribri Indigenous teachings to develop a Ph.D. research methodology for a food security project in Costa Rica. Our research approach was based on a Bribri concept related to cooperation, ulàpeitök; this concept guided our work and helped to reduce the negative consequences associated with conventional research with Indigenous people (e.g., extractive practices, reinforcement of gender inequality, misrepresenting cultural information). We identified three considerations that may be useful for other scholars applying Indigenous teachings to academic research: 1) build flexibility into the entire research program, 2) ensure that community-level and university-level researchers are willing to play multiple roles beyond those associated with conventional research, and 3) proceed with an ethic of friendship. Our work is relevant to scholars working in Indigenous/non-Indigenous research teams that aim to transform conventional research approaches to ensure that they support human rights, equity, and cultural continuity. In Costa Rica, our research is specifically relevant to building wider acceptance of Indigenous methodologies in higher education.
Ulàpeitök:利用布里布里土著教学发展博士研究方法
虽然人们对土著研究的兴趣越来越大,但关于如何将土著研究付诸实践的教育往往不是学术培训的一部分。为了提高人们对土著方法如何应用于学术研究的认识,我们描述了我们如何利用Bribri土著教学为哥斯达黎加的一个粮食安全项目开发博士研究方法。我们的研究方法基于与合作相关的Bribri概念,ulàpeitök;这一概念指导了我们的工作,并有助于减少与土著人民的传统研究相关的负面后果(例如,采掘实践,强化性别不平等,歪曲文化信息)。我们确定了三个可能对其他学者将土著教学应用于学术研究有用的考虑因素:1)在整个研究项目中建立灵活性;2)确保社区和大学水平的研究人员愿意在传统研究之外扮演多种角色;3)以友谊的伦理精神进行研究。我们的工作与在土著/非土著研究团队工作的学者有关,这些研究团队旨在改变传统的研究方法,以确保它们支持人权、公平和文化连续性。在哥斯达黎加,我们的研究与在高等教育中更广泛地接受土著方法有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信