CRITICAL THINKING EMBEDDEDNESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES

Natalija Valaviciene, Daiva Penkauskienė, J. Pivorienė, Asta Railiene, O. Merfeldaitė, J. Sadauskas, Violeta Jegeleviciene, V. Indrašienė
{"title":"CRITICAL THINKING EMBEDDEDNESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES","authors":"Natalija Valaviciene, Daiva Penkauskienė, J. Pivorienė, Asta Railiene, O. Merfeldaitė, J. Sadauskas, Violeta Jegeleviciene, V. Indrašienė","doi":"10.15503/jecs2020.2.121.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of this research is to examine how critical thinking is reflected in Lithuanian higher education study programmes and what conceptual model(s) of critical thinking are used by study programme  makers. \nMethods. The subject of the study encompasses 8 higher education study programmes and their subjects. They are analysed based on a constructed conceptual framework, which defines 9 critical thinking skills and 18 critical thinking dispositions. \nResults. Analysis, evaluation and decision making are the most common critical thinking skills embedded in the goals of a study course and its learning outcomes. Explanation, interpretation and making inferences are less pronounced. Dispositions are listed rarely and in quite an indistinct way. Only open-mindedness and honesty have clear expression and statement in study programmes, though to a lesser extent. Dispositions such as concern for every person, inquisitiveness and flexibility are very fragmented. \nConclusions. For the meantime, critical thinking is neither reflected equally and coherently in all parts of study programmes – course goals, content, described methods and learning outcomes – nor clear conceptual models of critical thinking can be detected. \nResearch restrictions. The policy of the colleges and universities on providing the descriptions of study programmes and syllabuses publicly, limits their accessibility. Due to the sampling of study programmes, the research represents only selected study programmes. \nPractical application. The created framework may be used to study programmes’ development by introducing the defined critical thinking skills in the descriptions of the study programmes more systematically.","PeriodicalId":256704,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2020.2.121.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this research is to examine how critical thinking is reflected in Lithuanian higher education study programmes and what conceptual model(s) of critical thinking are used by study programme  makers. Methods. The subject of the study encompasses 8 higher education study programmes and their subjects. They are analysed based on a constructed conceptual framework, which defines 9 critical thinking skills and 18 critical thinking dispositions. Results. Analysis, evaluation and decision making are the most common critical thinking skills embedded in the goals of a study course and its learning outcomes. Explanation, interpretation and making inferences are less pronounced. Dispositions are listed rarely and in quite an indistinct way. Only open-mindedness and honesty have clear expression and statement in study programmes, though to a lesser extent. Dispositions such as concern for every person, inquisitiveness and flexibility are very fragmented. Conclusions. For the meantime, critical thinking is neither reflected equally and coherently in all parts of study programmes – course goals, content, described methods and learning outcomes – nor clear conceptual models of critical thinking can be detected. Research restrictions. The policy of the colleges and universities on providing the descriptions of study programmes and syllabuses publicly, limits their accessibility. Due to the sampling of study programmes, the research represents only selected study programmes. Practical application. The created framework may be used to study programmes’ development by introducing the defined critical thinking skills in the descriptions of the study programmes more systematically.
高等教育课程中批判性思维的嵌入
的目标。本研究的目的是研究立陶宛高等教育学习计划如何反映批判性思维,以及学习计划制定者使用了哪些批判性思维概念模型。方法。研究的主题包括8个高等教育课程及其主题。它们是基于一个构建的概念框架进行分析的,该框架定义了9种批判性思维技能和18种批判性思维倾向。结果。分析、评估和决策是最常见的批判性思维技能,这些技能嵌入在学习课程的目标和学习成果中。解释、诠释和推断不那么明显。性格很少被列出,而且相当模糊。只有思想开放和诚实在学习计划中有明确的表达和陈述,尽管程度较低。关心每一个人、好奇和灵活性等性格是非常分散的。结论。与此同时,批判性思维既没有在学习计划的所有部分——课程目标、内容、描述的方法和学习成果——得到平等和连贯的反映,也没有发现批判性思维的清晰概念模型。研究的限制。学院和大学公开提供学习课程和教学大纲的政策限制了它们的可及性。由于研究项目的抽样,该研究仅代表选定的研究项目。实际的应用程序。创建的框架可以通过在学习项目的描述中更系统地引入定义的批判性思维技能来研究项目的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信