«Mykola Kostomarov’s pilgrimage to the Pochayiv Lavra». Correspondence and memoirs

34 Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-02
Olexander Bulyha
{"title":"«Mykola Kostomarov’s pilgrimage to the Pochayiv Lavra». Correspondence and memoirs","authors":"Olexander Bulyha","doi":"10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: based on correspondence and memoirs, to explore the work of a professional historian who uses the region of his temporary habitation, in order to collect materials for his own research interests.\n\nThe research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, objectivity, systematization, religious impartiality, and worldview pluralism. This made it possible to consider the processes that took place in the Pochaiv Monastery and were caused by state-political and religious-confessional changes, which were reflected in the historical progress of this Volyn monastery.\n\nScientific novelty. The stay of a scientist and a Christian in the largest monastery of the region, which attracted a researcher as a historical object and a pilgrim, as a Christian monastery, was analyzed. The past is presented universally: a) in the context of the profession of a scientist who visits historical sites, studies various sources, collects oral evidence, folklore materials; b) from point of view of a pilgrim traveler who honors monastic shrines, observes the peculiarities of monastic life, the psychology of the inhabitants of the monastery, notes the presence of other Christian objects in the orbit of monastic activity.\n\nThe urgency stems from the tasks of comprehensive study of the past of Ukrainian monasteries - centers of spirituality, education, culture and art. The urgency is also conditioned due to the contribution of Pochaiv monastery in the process of creating national cultural heritage. The state of the research of the problems of the Pochayiv Monastery requires in-depth study of issues related to various aspects of the functioning of the largest Christian monastery in Volyn.\n\nConclusions. Mykola Kostomarov memoirs and correspondence about his stay in the Pochaiv Monastery,which reflect the life of the monastery after Volhynia became part of Russia,allow us to understand the confessional atmosphere in the newly annexed territories. They are a kind of source that will help novice scholars to understand the diversity of the historian s work, which is based on the documentary diversity of the era they are studying. Continuation of the search for and elaboration of new materials related to the biography of Mykola Kostomarov will further reveal the scientific potential of this person, will complement the knowledge about his achievements in the field of historiography.","PeriodicalId":438406,"journal":{"name":"34","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: based on correspondence and memoirs, to explore the work of a professional historian who uses the region of his temporary habitation, in order to collect materials for his own research interests. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism, objectivity, systematization, religious impartiality, and worldview pluralism. This made it possible to consider the processes that took place in the Pochaiv Monastery and were caused by state-political and religious-confessional changes, which were reflected in the historical progress of this Volyn monastery. Scientific novelty. The stay of a scientist and a Christian in the largest monastery of the region, which attracted a researcher as a historical object and a pilgrim, as a Christian monastery, was analyzed. The past is presented universally: a) in the context of the profession of a scientist who visits historical sites, studies various sources, collects oral evidence, folklore materials; b) from point of view of a pilgrim traveler who honors monastic shrines, observes the peculiarities of monastic life, the psychology of the inhabitants of the monastery, notes the presence of other Christian objects in the orbit of monastic activity. The urgency stems from the tasks of comprehensive study of the past of Ukrainian monasteries - centers of spirituality, education, culture and art. The urgency is also conditioned due to the contribution of Pochaiv monastery in the process of creating national cultural heritage. The state of the research of the problems of the Pochayiv Monastery requires in-depth study of issues related to various aspects of the functioning of the largest Christian monastery in Volyn. Conclusions. Mykola Kostomarov memoirs and correspondence about his stay in the Pochaiv Monastery,which reflect the life of the monastery after Volhynia became part of Russia,allow us to understand the confessional atmosphere in the newly annexed territories. They are a kind of source that will help novice scholars to understand the diversity of the historian s work, which is based on the documentary diversity of the era they are studying. Continuation of the search for and elaboration of new materials related to the biography of Mykola Kostomarov will further reveal the scientific potential of this person, will complement the knowledge about his achievements in the field of historiography.
«尼古拉·科斯托马罗夫的朝圣之旅的波查耶夫修道院»。通信和回忆录
目的:根据信件和回忆录,探索一位专业历史学家的工作,他利用他暂时居住的地区,以便为他自己的研究兴趣收集材料。研究方法以历史决定论、客观性、系统性、宗教公正性和世界观多元主义为原则。这使得我们有可能考虑在Pochaiv修道院发生的进程,这些进程是由国家政治和宗教忏悔的变化引起的,这些变化反映在Volyn修道院的历史进程中。科学的新奇。研究人员分析了作为历史对象吸引研究人员和作为基督教修道院吸引朝圣者的该地区最大修道院的科学家和基督徒的住宿情况。过去是普遍呈现的:a)在科学家的职业背景下,他们参观历史遗迹,研究各种来源,收集口头证据,民间传说材料;b)从一个朝圣者的角度出发,他尊重修道院的神龛,观察修道院生活的特点,修道院居民的心理,注意到修道院活动轨道上其他基督教物体的存在。这种紧迫性源于对乌克兰修道院——精神、教育、文化和艺术中心——的历史进行全面研究的任务。由于Pochaiv寺在创造国家文化遗产过程中的贡献,这种紧迫性也受到了限制。波恰耶夫修道院问题的研究现状需要深入研究与沃林最大的基督教修道院运作的各个方面有关的问题。Mykola Kostomarov关于他在Pochaiv修道院的回忆录和信件,反映了Volhynia成为俄罗斯一部分后修道院的生活,使我们能够了解新吞并领土上的忏悔气氛。这是一种可以帮助新手学者了解历史学家作品的多样性的资料,这种多样性是基于他们所研究的时代的文献多样性。继续寻找和阐述与尼古拉·科斯托马罗夫传记有关的新材料将进一步揭示这位人物的科学潜力,将补充他在史学领域的成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
34
34
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信