"having Skin in the Game": a Value tension Study of an Inter- Agency IT Project

Randall Smith, J. Cranefield
{"title":"\"having Skin in the Game\": a Value tension Study of an Inter- Agency IT Project","authors":"Randall Smith, J. Cranefield","doi":"10.26686/wgtn.12910049.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2017 Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2017. All rights reserved. This study seeks to better understand the challenges involved in early stage development of citizen-facing Joined-Up Government and the mitigating strategies used to address these issues. In-depth interviews were carried out with 11 members of a unique, cross-agency case, the SmartStart life event project, the first of a planned suite of life event services in New Zealand’s public sector. Three key underlying value tensions were identified as contributing to agency challenges: New Public Management versus Joined-Up Government, Immediate Needs versus Long Term Benefits, and Waterfall versus Agile development approaches. Participants successfully addressed these value tensions through three concurrent mitigating strategies: active stewardship, citizen centricity, and creation of reusable artefacts. A framework is proposed, based on the concept of a base isolator, to illustrate the dynamics between the underlying value tensions and mitigating strategies, which enable effective practice of Joined-Up Government. Understanding these value tensions and their relationship to the mitigating strategies has implications for both practitioners and researchers.","PeriodicalId":309896,"journal":{"name":"European Conference on Information Systems","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Conference on Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.12910049.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

© 2017 Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2017. All rights reserved. This study seeks to better understand the challenges involved in early stage development of citizen-facing Joined-Up Government and the mitigating strategies used to address these issues. In-depth interviews were carried out with 11 members of a unique, cross-agency case, the SmartStart life event project, the first of a planned suite of life event services in New Zealand’s public sector. Three key underlying value tensions were identified as contributing to agency challenges: New Public Management versus Joined-Up Government, Immediate Needs versus Long Term Benefits, and Waterfall versus Agile development approaches. Participants successfully addressed these value tensions through three concurrent mitigating strategies: active stewardship, citizen centricity, and creation of reusable artefacts. A framework is proposed, based on the concept of a base isolator, to illustrate the dynamics between the underlying value tensions and mitigating strategies, which enable effective practice of Joined-Up Government. Understanding these value tensions and their relationship to the mitigating strategies has implications for both practitioners and researchers.
“利益攸关”:跨部门IT项目的价值张力研究
©2017第25届欧洲信息系统会议论文集,ECIS 2017。版权所有。本研究旨在更好地了解面向公民的联合政府早期发展所涉及的挑战以及用于解决这些问题的缓解策略。对一个独特的跨机构案例——SmartStart生活事件项目的11名成员进行了深入采访,该项目是新西兰公共部门计划的生活事件服务套件中的第一个。三个关键的潜在价值冲突被确定为促成代理挑战的因素:新公共管理vs联合政府,即时需求vs长期利益,瀑布开发vs敏捷开发方法。参与者通过三个并行的缓解策略成功地解决了这些价值紧张关系:积极的管理、以公民为中心和创建可重用的工件。基于基本隔离器的概念,提出了一个框架,以说明潜在的价值紧张关系和缓解策略之间的动态关系,从而使联合政府的有效实践成为可能。理解这些价值张力及其与缓解策略的关系对从业者和研究人员都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书