Analisis Kesehatan PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk Profil, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Periode 2013-2021

Zulfa Eliza Ziauddin, Tia Risnaini
{"title":"Analisis Kesehatan PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia, Tbk. Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Risk Profil, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) Periode 2013-2021","authors":"Zulfa Eliza Ziauddin, Tia Risnaini","doi":"10.32505/jim.v4i2.4818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nABSTRACT \nThis study aims to determine the health condition of Bank Muamalat Indonesia for the period 2013-2021 in terms of each aspect of the RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). The variables used are risk profile as measured by the ratio of NPF and FDR, Good Corporate Governance is measured through the results of self-assessment, earnings are measured by the ratio of NOM, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and capital is measured by the CAR ratio. This study uses descriptive analysis with a quantitative approach. The population in this study is the financial statements of Bank Muamalat Indonesia and the sample used is 64 data on te the financial ratios of Bank Muamalat Indonesia. The data used in this research is secondary data. Data collection techniques using documentation techniques. The results of the study indicate that the financial performance of Bank Muamalat Indonesia for the period 2013-2021 in terms of the Risk Profile aspect, which is in adequate condition. Aspects of Good Corporate Governance through the results of self-assesment are quite adequate. For the Earnings aspect, it is inadequate and for the Capital aspect, it is very adequate. The composite rating obtained by Bank Muamalat Indonesia for the nine years in 2013 was 72.5% with a rating of (healthy), in 2014 it was 62.5% with a rating of 3 (fairly healthy), in 2015 it was 52.5% with rank 4 (unhealthy), in 2016 it was 52,5% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy), in 2017 it was 52.5% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy), in 2018 it was 55% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy), in 2019 it was 55% with a rating of 4 (unhealthy), in 2020 it was 50% with a rating of 4 (unhealthy), and in 2021 it was 60% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy).","PeriodicalId":360570,"journal":{"name":"JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/jim.v4i2.4818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

  ABSTRACT This study aims to determine the health condition of Bank Muamalat Indonesia for the period 2013-2021 in terms of each aspect of the RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital). The variables used are risk profile as measured by the ratio of NPF and FDR, Good Corporate Governance is measured through the results of self-assessment, earnings are measured by the ratio of NOM, ROA, ROE, BOPO, and capital is measured by the CAR ratio. This study uses descriptive analysis with a quantitative approach. The population in this study is the financial statements of Bank Muamalat Indonesia and the sample used is 64 data on te the financial ratios of Bank Muamalat Indonesia. The data used in this research is secondary data. Data collection techniques using documentation techniques. The results of the study indicate that the financial performance of Bank Muamalat Indonesia for the period 2013-2021 in terms of the Risk Profile aspect, which is in adequate condition. Aspects of Good Corporate Governance through the results of self-assesment are quite adequate. For the Earnings aspect, it is inadequate and for the Capital aspect, it is very adequate. The composite rating obtained by Bank Muamalat Indonesia for the nine years in 2013 was 72.5% with a rating of (healthy), in 2014 it was 62.5% with a rating of 3 (fairly healthy), in 2015 it was 52.5% with rank 4 (unhealthy), in 2016 it was 52,5% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy), in 2017 it was 52.5% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy), in 2018 it was 55% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy), in 2019 it was 55% with a rating of 4 (unhealthy), in 2020 it was 50% with a rating of 4 (unhealthy), and in 2021 it was 60% with a rank of 4 (unhealthy).
PT.印尼Muamalat银行健康分析,Tbk。使用RGEC方法(风险配置、良好的公司治理、Earnings, Capital), 2013-2021年
本研究旨在确定2013-2021年期间印尼穆马拉银行在RGEC(风险概况,良好的公司治理,收益和资本)的各个方面的健康状况。使用的变量是由NPF和FDR的比率衡量的风险概况,通过自我评估的结果衡量良好的公司治理,收益由NOM, ROA, ROE, BOPO的比率衡量,资本由CAR比率衡量。本研究采用描述性分析与定量分析相结合的方法。本研究中的人口是印度尼西亚Muamalat银行的财务报表,使用的样本是印度尼西亚Muamalat银行财务比率的64个数据。本研究使用的数据为二手数据。使用文档技术的数据收集技术。研究结果表明,印尼茂马拉银行2013-2021年期间的财务绩效在风险概况方面处于适当状态。良好的公司管治方面通过自我评估的结果是相当充分的。对于收益方面,它是不充分的,而对于资本方面,它是非常充分的。银行获得的综合评级Muamalat印尼2013年九年是72.5%的评级(健康),在2014年,它被62.5%的评级3(相当健康的),这是2015年的52.5%等级4(不健康),2016年52岁,5%的等级4(不健康),在2017年,它被52.5%的等级4(不健康),在2018年,它被55%的等级4(不健康),在2019年,它被55%的评级4(不健康),在2020年,它被50%的评级4(不健康),而在2021年,这一比例为60%,排名为4(不健康)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信