{"title":"The problem of creativity and scientific heritage of Machiavelli in the framework of the historiographical assessments of Francesco De Sanctis","authors":"S. Saranov","doi":"10.21272/shaj.2023.i40.p.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problem of creativity and scientific heritage of Niccolò Machiavelli in the system of historiographic assessments by Francesco De Sanctis (1817-1883). The author states the importance of addressing this issue in the era of globalization, since the era of the Italian Renaissance reflected cardinal changes in the interpretation of the historical process. In addition, in the era of globalization, the question of the system for forming the stages of historiographic assessments of Machiavelli's scientific heritage has significant methodological potential. Of particular interest in this regard is the Italian historiography of the 19th century, which developed under the influence of the emergence of a single centralized Italian state. What the Italians failed in the 16th century, what Machiavelli dreamed about in the final chapter of The Prince, became a historical fact in 1861. Of course, before the Italian historiography, a natural question arose about the creation of a holistic picture of Italian social and political life, within which the name of Machiavelli was to occupy a significant place. Thus, after Italy gained its statehood in the 19th century, representatives of Italian historiography faced the task of determining the true place of the entire scientific heritage of Machiavelli within the framework of Italian historical development. This task was brilliantly solved in the framework of the «History of Italian Literature» by Francesco De Sanctis (1817-1883).Consideration of the problems of creativity and scientific heritage of Machiavelli in the system of historiographic assessments by Francesco De Sanctis allows us to state the deep theoretical and methodological significance of these assessments. In de Sanctis' assessments of Machiavelli's heritage, not only a dry academic approach prevails, but also the desire to tie these assessments to De Sanctis' contemporary Italian political life of the 19th century. The scientific heritage and work of Machiavelli is considered by Francesco De Sanctis as a kind of lesson for the present. Machiavelli, who relies on realism and yet pays tribute to Fortune, is regarded as precisely a modern author. The assessments of the outstanding Italian scholar expressed in the second volume of the «History of Italian Literature» laid the foundation for a significant part of the modern interpretation of Machiavelli. In the era of globalization, the appeal to the key aspects of the formation of assessments of creativity and scientific heritage of Machiavelli within the framework of Italian historiography of the 19th century is of considerable interest. Thus, the views of Machiavelli were formed in a complex and rich atmosphere of the decline of the political influence of Italy, which became a fact after the military events of 1494. This allows us, in turn, referring to the heritage of the Florentine thinker, to see the content of his concepts in the light of the challenges of the era of globalization and the formation of a new world order.","PeriodicalId":373935,"journal":{"name":"SUMY HISTORICAL AND ARCHIVAL JOURNAL","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SUMY HISTORICAL AND ARCHIVAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21272/shaj.2023.i40.p.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article deals with the problem of creativity and scientific heritage of Niccolò Machiavelli in the system of historiographic assessments by Francesco De Sanctis (1817-1883). The author states the importance of addressing this issue in the era of globalization, since the era of the Italian Renaissance reflected cardinal changes in the interpretation of the historical process. In addition, in the era of globalization, the question of the system for forming the stages of historiographic assessments of Machiavelli's scientific heritage has significant methodological potential. Of particular interest in this regard is the Italian historiography of the 19th century, which developed under the influence of the emergence of a single centralized Italian state. What the Italians failed in the 16th century, what Machiavelli dreamed about in the final chapter of The Prince, became a historical fact in 1861. Of course, before the Italian historiography, a natural question arose about the creation of a holistic picture of Italian social and political life, within which the name of Machiavelli was to occupy a significant place. Thus, after Italy gained its statehood in the 19th century, representatives of Italian historiography faced the task of determining the true place of the entire scientific heritage of Machiavelli within the framework of Italian historical development. This task was brilliantly solved in the framework of the «History of Italian Literature» by Francesco De Sanctis (1817-1883).Consideration of the problems of creativity and scientific heritage of Machiavelli in the system of historiographic assessments by Francesco De Sanctis allows us to state the deep theoretical and methodological significance of these assessments. In de Sanctis' assessments of Machiavelli's heritage, not only a dry academic approach prevails, but also the desire to tie these assessments to De Sanctis' contemporary Italian political life of the 19th century. The scientific heritage and work of Machiavelli is considered by Francesco De Sanctis as a kind of lesson for the present. Machiavelli, who relies on realism and yet pays tribute to Fortune, is regarded as precisely a modern author. The assessments of the outstanding Italian scholar expressed in the second volume of the «History of Italian Literature» laid the foundation for a significant part of the modern interpretation of Machiavelli. In the era of globalization, the appeal to the key aspects of the formation of assessments of creativity and scientific heritage of Machiavelli within the framework of Italian historiography of the 19th century is of considerable interest. Thus, the views of Machiavelli were formed in a complex and rich atmosphere of the decline of the political influence of Italy, which became a fact after the military events of 1494. This allows us, in turn, referring to the heritage of the Florentine thinker, to see the content of his concepts in the light of the challenges of the era of globalization and the formation of a new world order.
本文论述了在弗朗西斯科·德·桑科斯(1817-1883)的史学评价体系中Niccolò马基雅维利的创造性和科学遗产问题。作者阐述了在全球化时代解决这一问题的重要性,因为意大利文艺复兴时代反映了对历史进程的解释发生了根本性的变化。此外,在全球化时代,形成马基雅维利科学遗产的史学评估阶段的系统问题具有重要的方法论潜力。在这方面特别令人感兴趣的是19世纪的意大利史学,它是在单一中央集权的意大利国家出现的影响下发展起来的。意大利人在16世纪的失败,马基雅维利在《君主论》最后一章的梦想,在1861年成为历史事实。当然,在意大利史学出现之前,一个自然的问题是关于意大利社会和政治生活的整体图景的创造,马基雅维利的名字在其中占据了重要的位置。因此,在意大利于19世纪获得国家地位后,意大利史学的代表们面临着在意大利历史发展的框架内确定马基雅维利的整个科学遗产的真正位置的任务。这一任务在弗朗西斯科·德·桑科蒂斯(1817-1883)的《意大利文学史》一书中得到了出色的解决。在弗朗西斯科·德·桑科斯(Francesco De Sanctis)的史学评估体系中,对马基雅维利的创造力和科学遗产问题的考虑,使我们能够阐明这些评估的深刻理论和方法论意义。在德·桑科蒂斯对马基雅维利遗产的评价中,不仅流行的是枯燥的学术方法,而且还希望将这些评价与德·桑科蒂斯19世纪当代意大利政治生活联系起来。马基雅维利的科学遗产和工作被弗朗西斯科·德·桑科斯认为是对现在的一种教训。马基雅维利依靠现实主义,但又向命运致敬,被认为是一位真正的现代作家。《意大利文学史》第二卷中对这位杰出意大利学者的评价,为马基雅维利的现代解读奠定了重要的基础。在全球化时代,在19世纪意大利史学的框架内,对马基雅维利的创造力和科学遗产的评估形成的关键方面的呼吁是相当有趣的。因此,马基雅维利的观点是在意大利政治影响力下降的复杂而丰富的氛围中形成的,这在1494年的军事事件之后成为事实。反过来,这使我们能够参照佛罗伦萨思想家的遗产,根据全球化时代的挑战和新的世界秩序的形成来看待他的概念的内容。