Uncertainty Management for Well Planning and Execution; Case Study of New Drills in Tom Boy Field in the Swamp Niger Delta

B. Taiwo, T. Z. Igiri, J. Onyeji, Oduware Ohenhen, Fagbowore Olufisayo, F. Zen, Asaolu Ayodele, Oragwu Aluba, Chukwuka Clement
{"title":"Uncertainty Management for Well Planning and Execution; Case Study of New Drills in Tom Boy Field in the Swamp Niger Delta","authors":"B. Taiwo, T. Z. Igiri, J. Onyeji, Oduware Ohenhen, Fagbowore Olufisayo, F. Zen, Asaolu Ayodele, Oragwu Aluba, Chukwuka Clement","doi":"10.2118/217193-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Tom Boy field is one of the oldest fields in the Niger Delta Basin with more than 30 wells at the time of initiating infill development drilling campaign. The drilling campaign of 11 wells (10 producers and 1 Water Source) was planned to develop reservoirs that have not been produced and to optimize production from developed reservoirs. Numerous challenges were faced in the planning and execution phases for the infill drilling. Key uncertainties include, Structure, Stratigraphy, wellbore placement issues, current fluid saturation/contacts in the reservoirs, and wellbore instability issues as wells drilled through pressure-depleted reservoirs. Thus, this paper addressed how these uncertainties were managed during planning and execution of the drilling program.\n Through integration of detailed Uncertainty Management Plan (UMP) during execution, the team eliminated the need for drilling pilot well in an instance; and in another scenario, successfully landed a horizontal well in a 10ft thick sand. The methodology used include deployment of improved technologies, proper planning, appropriate mud-weight design, history matched reservoir models, optimizing subsurface target locations for data acquisition and proper well sequencing on the drilling schedule was used to understand the current saturation in some target reservoirs and target the sweet spot in the reservoir. Pre-execution decision tree assisted with making quick real time decisions while drilling the landing and lateral hole sections based on the outcome of each uncertainty identified in the UMP signpost. Decision tree incorporated all information (earth model, seismic data, dips, local pre-drill model etc.) integrated with potential outcomes from real-time reservoir navigation data obtained from geosteering tools to aid well placement in an optimal position within clean sand. All wells were successfully drilled and completed in the sweet spot of target reservoirs to meet pre-drill production targets.","PeriodicalId":407977,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/217193-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Tom Boy field is one of the oldest fields in the Niger Delta Basin with more than 30 wells at the time of initiating infill development drilling campaign. The drilling campaign of 11 wells (10 producers and 1 Water Source) was planned to develop reservoirs that have not been produced and to optimize production from developed reservoirs. Numerous challenges were faced in the planning and execution phases for the infill drilling. Key uncertainties include, Structure, Stratigraphy, wellbore placement issues, current fluid saturation/contacts in the reservoirs, and wellbore instability issues as wells drilled through pressure-depleted reservoirs. Thus, this paper addressed how these uncertainties were managed during planning and execution of the drilling program. Through integration of detailed Uncertainty Management Plan (UMP) during execution, the team eliminated the need for drilling pilot well in an instance; and in another scenario, successfully landed a horizontal well in a 10ft thick sand. The methodology used include deployment of improved technologies, proper planning, appropriate mud-weight design, history matched reservoir models, optimizing subsurface target locations for data acquisition and proper well sequencing on the drilling schedule was used to understand the current saturation in some target reservoirs and target the sweet spot in the reservoir. Pre-execution decision tree assisted with making quick real time decisions while drilling the landing and lateral hole sections based on the outcome of each uncertainty identified in the UMP signpost. Decision tree incorporated all information (earth model, seismic data, dips, local pre-drill model etc.) integrated with potential outcomes from real-time reservoir navigation data obtained from geosteering tools to aid well placement in an optimal position within clean sand. All wells were successfully drilled and completed in the sweet spot of target reservoirs to meet pre-drill production targets.
井眼计划与执行中的不确定性管理尼日尔三角洲沼泽Tom Boy油田新钻机案例研究
Tom Boy油田是尼日尔三角洲盆地最古老的油田之一,在开始进行填充开发钻井活动时,拥有30多口井。计划钻探11口井(10口生产井和1口水源井),以开发尚未开采的油藏,并优化已开发油藏的产量。在规划和执行过程中,面临着许多挑战。主要的不确定因素包括:结构、地层、井筒位置问题、油藏中当前流体饱和度/接触量问题,以及在压力枯竭油藏中钻井时的井筒不稳定性问题。因此,本文讨论了在钻井计划的规划和执行过程中如何管理这些不确定性。通过在执行过程中整合详细的不确定性管理计划(UMP),该团队消除了在一个实例中钻探先导井的需要;在另一个场景中,成功地将一口水平井置于10英尺厚的沙子中。采用的方法包括改进技术的部署、合理的规划、合适的泥浆密度设计、历史匹配的油藏模型、优化地下目标位置以获取数据,以及根据钻井计划进行适当的井序,以了解一些目标油藏的当前饱和度,并确定油藏的最佳位置。预执行决策树有助于在钻井着陆井段和水平井段时,根据UMP路标中确定的每个不确定性的结果,做出快速的实时决策。决策树将所有信息(地球模型、地震数据、倾角、局部预钻模型等)与地质导向工具获得的实时油藏导航数据的潜在结果相结合,以帮助在清洁砂层中选择最佳位置。所有井均在目标储层的最佳位置钻完井,达到钻前生产目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信