Probabilistic bug-masking analysis for post-silicon tests in microprocessor verification

Doowon Lee, Tom Kolan, A. Morgenshtein, V. Sokhin, Ronny Morad, A. Ziv, V. Bertacco
{"title":"Probabilistic bug-masking analysis for post-silicon tests in microprocessor verification","authors":"Doowon Lee, Tom Kolan, A. Morgenshtein, V. Sokhin, Ronny Morad, A. Ziv, V. Bertacco","doi":"10.1145/2897937.2898072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-silicon validation has become essential in catching hard-to-detect, rarely-occurring bugs that have slipped through pre-silicon verification. Post-silicon validation flows, however, are challenged by limited signal observability, which impacts their ability of diagnosing and detecting bugs. Indeed, bug manifestations during the execution of constrained-random tests may be masked and be unobservable from the test's outputs. The ability to evaluate the bug-masking rate of a test provides great value in generating and/or selecting effective tests for high coverage regressions. To this end, we propose an efficient, static bug-masking analysis solution, called BugMAPI. BugMAPI tracks the information flow in a test program, and it estimates the probability that bugs go undetected by the checking mechanisms in place in the post-silicon platform. To achieve this goal, we leverage static code analysis and a novel, lightweight, probability estimation algorithm. We evaluated BugMAPI on a range of industrial constrained-random tests and a range of bug injection models, and we found that it can estimate bugmasking rates with an accuracy of 77% in 3 orders-of-magnitude less time, compared to an ideal dynamic analysis solution.","PeriodicalId":185271,"journal":{"name":"2016 53nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 53nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897937.2898072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Post-silicon validation has become essential in catching hard-to-detect, rarely-occurring bugs that have slipped through pre-silicon verification. Post-silicon validation flows, however, are challenged by limited signal observability, which impacts their ability of diagnosing and detecting bugs. Indeed, bug manifestations during the execution of constrained-random tests may be masked and be unobservable from the test's outputs. The ability to evaluate the bug-masking rate of a test provides great value in generating and/or selecting effective tests for high coverage regressions. To this end, we propose an efficient, static bug-masking analysis solution, called BugMAPI. BugMAPI tracks the information flow in a test program, and it estimates the probability that bugs go undetected by the checking mechanisms in place in the post-silicon platform. To achieve this goal, we leverage static code analysis and a novel, lightweight, probability estimation algorithm. We evaluated BugMAPI on a range of industrial constrained-random tests and a range of bug injection models, and we found that it can estimate bugmasking rates with an accuracy of 77% in 3 orders-of-magnitude less time, compared to an ideal dynamic analysis solution.
微处理器验证中后硅测试的概率bug屏蔽分析
后硅验证对于捕捉通过前硅验证而漏失的难以检测的、很少发生的错误至关重要。然而,后硅验证流受到有限的信号可观察性的挑战,这影响了它们诊断和检测错误的能力。实际上,在执行约束随机测试期间的bug表现可能会被掩盖,并且从测试的输出中无法观察到。评估测试的错误屏蔽率的能力在为高覆盖率回归生成和/或选择有效的测试方面提供了很大的价值。为此,我们提出了一个高效的静态bug屏蔽分析解决方案,称为BugMAPI。BugMAPI跟踪测试程序中的信息流,并估计bug未被后硅平台中的检查机制检测到的概率。为了实现这一目标,我们利用静态代码分析和一种新颖的、轻量级的概率估计算法。我们在一系列工业约束随机测试和一系列漏洞注入模型上对BugMAPI进行了评估,我们发现,与理想的动态分析解决方案相比,它可以在3个数量级的时间内以77%的准确率估计bug掩蔽率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信