BIM OBJECTS LIBRARY FOR INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN PUBLIC WORKS: THE USE OF PROPRIETARY AND OPEN FORMATS

Ambra Barbini, G. Malacarne, G. Massari, G. P. Monizza, D. Matt
{"title":"BIM OBJECTS LIBRARY FOR INFORMATION EXCHANGE IN PUBLIC WORKS: THE USE OF PROPRIETARY AND OPEN FORMATS","authors":"Ambra Barbini, G. Malacarne, G. Massari, G. P. Monizza, D. Matt","doi":"10.2495/bim190231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Italian code of public procurement states that interoperability via open formats is essential for the exchange of information between public organizations and their project partners. However, the understanding of what interoperability means and the use of open formats in the current practice is still limited. Moreover, one of the approaches that a public organization can adopt to share its information requirements among project partners is via parametric objects, such as BIM families. This approach is not commonly adopted, it is very time consuming, but it allows the integration of the client’s requirements directly into the project. This paper aims at investigating whether a BIM objects library can be the solution to facilitate the interoperability in information exchange between public organizations and their project partners. The paper shows a parallelism between the use of the proprietary and the open format when using BIM objects in a project environment comparing the open and the proprietary format of a BIM object library in terms of interoperability. This research refers to a case study consisting of the development of a BIM objects library for a public organization in Italy. The results shows that both proprietary and open formats are an efficient solution when developing a BIM library for a public organization. However, their usefulness depends on the way the public organization choose to organize its own BIM adoption.","PeriodicalId":264899,"journal":{"name":"Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations III","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Design, Construction and Operations III","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/bim190231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Italian code of public procurement states that interoperability via open formats is essential for the exchange of information between public organizations and their project partners. However, the understanding of what interoperability means and the use of open formats in the current practice is still limited. Moreover, one of the approaches that a public organization can adopt to share its information requirements among project partners is via parametric objects, such as BIM families. This approach is not commonly adopted, it is very time consuming, but it allows the integration of the client’s requirements directly into the project. This paper aims at investigating whether a BIM objects library can be the solution to facilitate the interoperability in information exchange between public organizations and their project partners. The paper shows a parallelism between the use of the proprietary and the open format when using BIM objects in a project environment comparing the open and the proprietary format of a BIM object library in terms of interoperability. This research refers to a case study consisting of the development of a BIM objects library for a public organization in Italy. The results shows that both proprietary and open formats are an efficient solution when developing a BIM library for a public organization. However, their usefulness depends on the way the public organization choose to organize its own BIM adoption.
用于公共工程信息交换的Bim对象库:专有和开放格式的使用
意大利的公共采购守则指出,通过开放格式的互操作性对于公共组织与其项目合作伙伴之间的信息交换至关重要。然而,对互操作性的含义和开放格式在当前实践中的使用的理解仍然有限。此外,公共组织可以采用的在项目合作伙伴之间共享信息需求的方法之一是通过参数化对象,例如BIM家族。这种方法不常被采用,它非常耗时,但是它允许将客户的需求直接集成到项目中。本文旨在探讨BIM对象库是否可以成为促进公共组织与其项目合作伙伴之间信息交换互操作性的解决方案。本文展示了在项目环境中使用BIM对象时使用专有格式和开放格式之间的并行性,比较了BIM对象库的开放格式和专有格式的互操作性。本研究是一个案例研究,包括为意大利的一个公共组织开发BIM对象库。结果表明,在为公共组织开发BIM库时,专有格式和开放格式都是有效的解决方案。然而,它们的有用性取决于公共组织选择组织自己的BIM采用的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信