Stres pada Mahasiswa STT Cipanas: Perbandingan antara Pembelajaran Tatap Muka dan Daring

Martin Elvis
{"title":"Stres pada Mahasiswa STT Cipanas: Perbandingan antara Pembelajaran Tatap Muka dan Daring","authors":"Martin Elvis","doi":"10.47900/nptrs.v3i1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn dealing with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cipanas Theological Seminary students must adapt to changes in the Distance Learning process. This has an impact on student academic stress. The study was conducted on 43 (semester 3 and semester 5) students of STT Cipanas as participants to see the difference in academic stress levels between students who have studied face-to-face with students who take distance learning. To obtain data on differences in stress levels between face-to-face lectures and distance learning, researchers used the Academic Stress Scale measuring instrument which has been translated in Awaludin's research (2015). This instrument has been modified by Setiadi, et al (2020). With the analysis technique of Independent Samples T-Test and Paired Sample T-Test. 1) The academic stress level of 3rd semester students during distance learning is significantly higher than 5th semester. 2) The level of academic stress of 5th semester students during distance learning is significantly higher than face-to-face learning. Although the COVID-19 pandemic is not certain to be completed in a short time, the institution can use the results of this research to develop learning designs that minimize academic stress on students in distance learning.","PeriodicalId":364402,"journal":{"name":"The New Perspective in Theology and Religious Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The New Perspective in Theology and Religious Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47900/nptrs.v3i1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractIn dealing with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Cipanas Theological Seminary students must adapt to changes in the Distance Learning process. This has an impact on student academic stress. The study was conducted on 43 (semester 3 and semester 5) students of STT Cipanas as participants to see the difference in academic stress levels between students who have studied face-to-face with students who take distance learning. To obtain data on differences in stress levels between face-to-face lectures and distance learning, researchers used the Academic Stress Scale measuring instrument which has been translated in Awaludin's research (2015). This instrument has been modified by Setiadi, et al (2020). With the analysis technique of Independent Samples T-Test and Paired Sample T-Test. 1) The academic stress level of 3rd semester students during distance learning is significantly higher than 5th semester. 2) The level of academic stress of 5th semester students during distance learning is significantly higher than face-to-face learning. Although the COVID-19 pandemic is not certain to be completed in a short time, the institution can use the results of this research to develop learning designs that minimize academic stress on students in distance learning.
学生STT cihot的压力:面对面学习与在线学习的比较
为应对新冠肺炎疫情的影响,西帕纳斯神学院的学生必须适应远程学习过程的变化。这对学生的学业压力有影响。本研究以STT Cipanas的43名(第3学期和第5学期)学生为研究对象,观察面对面学习的学生与远程学习的学生在学业压力水平上的差异。为了获得面对面授课和远程学习之间压力水平差异的数据,研究人员使用了Awaludin研究(2015)中翻译的学术压力量表测量工具。Setiadi等人(2020)对该仪器进行了改进。采用独立样本t检验和配对样本t检验的分析技术。1)远程学习第三学期学生的学业压力水平显著高于第五学期。2)第五学期学生远程学习的学业压力水平显著高于面对面学习。虽然COVID-19大流行不一定能在短时间内结束,但该机构可以利用这项研究的结果制定学习设计,最大限度地减少学生在远程学习中的学业压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信