A Safety Analysis of UAV Mapping Operations

A. Vela, L. Ferreira, Taylor Babin
{"title":"A Safety Analysis of UAV Mapping Operations","authors":"A. Vela, L. Ferreira, Taylor Babin","doi":"10.1109/DASC.2018.8569743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction and ongoing integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) into the National Airspace System requires appropriate management and regulation. To ensure safe access for all stakeholders the Federal Aviation Administration has established regulations for hobbyist and commercial operators of UAVs, partially supplemented with concurrent guidelines for hobbyist from the Academy of Model Aeronautics. Initially, many of the regulations regarding UAVs sought to maintain current safety standards by ensuring air traffic segregation between manned and unmanned aircraft. That said, much of the ongoing regulation development has occurred without data and evidence-driven practices; regulators have based decisions without accurate knowledge of the real-world usage of UAVs. In an attempt to support ongoing regulation and policy development this initial study reports statistics regarding pilot observance of UAV regulations and guidelines when performing mapping operations. Over 168,000 UAV trajectories, representing real-world UAV mapping operations, are analyzed to determine if pilots likely maintained visualline-of-sight, and followed 400 ft altitude guidelines and airspace restrictions. While global variations are noted, UAV pilots performing mapping operations within the United States are observed to widely comply with regulations. Troubling however, the analysis indicates that the small group of UAV pilots exceeding altitude regulations are much more likely to break other regulations as well, thereby increasing the risk of interaction with manned aircraft.","PeriodicalId":405724,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2018.8569743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The introduction and ongoing integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) into the National Airspace System requires appropriate management and regulation. To ensure safe access for all stakeholders the Federal Aviation Administration has established regulations for hobbyist and commercial operators of UAVs, partially supplemented with concurrent guidelines for hobbyist from the Academy of Model Aeronautics. Initially, many of the regulations regarding UAVs sought to maintain current safety standards by ensuring air traffic segregation between manned and unmanned aircraft. That said, much of the ongoing regulation development has occurred without data and evidence-driven practices; regulators have based decisions without accurate knowledge of the real-world usage of UAVs. In an attempt to support ongoing regulation and policy development this initial study reports statistics regarding pilot observance of UAV regulations and guidelines when performing mapping operations. Over 168,000 UAV trajectories, representing real-world UAV mapping operations, are analyzed to determine if pilots likely maintained visualline-of-sight, and followed 400 ft altitude guidelines and airspace restrictions. While global variations are noted, UAV pilots performing mapping operations within the United States are observed to widely comply with regulations. Troubling however, the analysis indicates that the small group of UAV pilots exceeding altitude regulations are much more likely to break other regulations as well, thereby increasing the risk of interaction with manned aircraft.
无人机测绘作业的安全性分析
无人驾驶飞行器(UAV)进入国家空域系统需要适当的管理和监管。为了确保所有利益相关者的安全访问,联邦航空管理局为无人机爱好者和商业运营商制定了法规,部分补充了模型航空学院爱好者的并行指南。最初,许多关于无人机的法规试图通过确保有人驾驶和无人驾驶飞机之间的空中交通隔离来维持当前的安全标准。也就是说,许多正在进行的监管发展都是在没有数据和证据驱动的实践的情况下发生的;监管机构在没有准确了解无人机实际使用情况的情况下做出了决定。为了支持正在进行的法规和政策制定,本初步研究报告了关于飞行员在执行测绘操作时遵守无人机法规和指导方针的统计数据。研究人员分析了超过16.8万架无人机的轨迹,这些轨迹代表了真实世界的无人机测绘操作,以确定飞行员是否可能保持视距,并遵循400英尺的高度指南和空域限制。虽然注意到全球变化,但在美国境内执行测绘操作的无人机飞行员被观察到广泛遵守法规。然而,令人不安的是,分析表明,一小群超过高度规定的无人机飞行员更有可能违反其他规定,从而增加与有人驾驶飞机互动的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信