Basic features and characteristics of behavioral and experimental economy formation

Taras Demkura, I. Markovych
{"title":"Basic features and characteristics of behavioral and experimental economy formation","authors":"Taras Demkura, I. Markovych","doi":"10.33108/sepd2022.02.465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preconditions for the emergence of behavioral economics are examined in the article, the relationship between behavioral and experimental economics are outlined and the features of the economic entities behavior irrationality are identified. The irrationality of human behavior from the standpoint of modern researchers and assumptions about the possibility of predicting such irrationality in economic models are analyzed. The peculiarities of conducting experiments are highlighted and their significance for research in behavioral economics is proved. It is shown that economic theories, which are based on a methodological approach to understanding human behavior as absolutely rational, formalization of scenarios of its behavior have long failed to withstand scientific criticism and do not have enough convincing empirical evidence. The differences between the research tools in behavioral and experimental economics are determined. The difference between \"economy\" and \"humane\" is shown. Economic people must make their decisions based on logic and mathematics, and humane people are characterized by volatility of decisions due to the tendency to framing and other cognitive biases. It is shown that the \"economy\" has the following features: a priority desire to meet their own needs and the development of personal interest; natural desire to improve their own economic situation; leveling of psychological, ethical and spiritual values in order to achieve economic goals; full awareness of the phenomena and trends of economic processes; rational economic behavior, etc. It has been determined that the subjects of economic relations are guided not by absolute rationality, but often by emotional or instinctive impulses, which are often inconsistent with the logical mechanism of decision-making from the point of view of efficiency. A promising area of further research is the analysis of cognitive biases, psychophysiological patterns, social norms and their impact on decision-making processes in the economy.","PeriodicalId":402980,"journal":{"name":"Socio-Economic Problems and the State","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-Economic Problems and the State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33108/sepd2022.02.465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The preconditions for the emergence of behavioral economics are examined in the article, the relationship between behavioral and experimental economics are outlined and the features of the economic entities behavior irrationality are identified. The irrationality of human behavior from the standpoint of modern researchers and assumptions about the possibility of predicting such irrationality in economic models are analyzed. The peculiarities of conducting experiments are highlighted and their significance for research in behavioral economics is proved. It is shown that economic theories, which are based on a methodological approach to understanding human behavior as absolutely rational, formalization of scenarios of its behavior have long failed to withstand scientific criticism and do not have enough convincing empirical evidence. The differences between the research tools in behavioral and experimental economics are determined. The difference between "economy" and "humane" is shown. Economic people must make their decisions based on logic and mathematics, and humane people are characterized by volatility of decisions due to the tendency to framing and other cognitive biases. It is shown that the "economy" has the following features: a priority desire to meet their own needs and the development of personal interest; natural desire to improve their own economic situation; leveling of psychological, ethical and spiritual values in order to achieve economic goals; full awareness of the phenomena and trends of economic processes; rational economic behavior, etc. It has been determined that the subjects of economic relations are guided not by absolute rationality, but often by emotional or instinctive impulses, which are often inconsistent with the logical mechanism of decision-making from the point of view of efficiency. A promising area of further research is the analysis of cognitive biases, psychophysiological patterns, social norms and their impact on decision-making processes in the economy.
行为经济和实验经济形成的基本特征和特征
本文考察了行为经济学产生的前提条件,概述了行为经济学与实验经济学的关系,明确了经济主体行为非理性的特征。从现代研究者的角度分析了人类行为的不合理性,并分析了在经济模型中预测这种不合理性的可能性。强调了实验的特殊性,证明了实验对行为经济学研究的重要意义。它表明,经济理论,这是基于一种方法方法来理解人类行为是绝对理性的,其行为情景的形式化长期以来未能经受住科学批评,也没有足够令人信服的经验证据。确定了行为经济学和实验经济学研究工具之间的差异。“经济”和“人道”的区别也在这里得到了体现。经济人必须根据逻辑和数学做出决定,而人文人的特点是由于框架倾向和其他认知偏见而导致决策的波动性。研究表明,“经济”具有以下特点:优先满足自身需求的欲望和个人利益的发展;改善自身经济状况的自然愿望;平衡心理、伦理和精神价值,以实现经济目标;充分认识经济进程的现象和趋势;理性的经济行为等。人们已经确定,经济关系的主体不是由绝对理性引导的,而是往往由情感或本能的冲动引导的,从效率的角度来看,这往往与决策的逻辑机制不一致。一个有前景的进一步研究领域是对认知偏见、心理生理模式、社会规范及其对经济决策过程的影响的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信