E pluribus unum Shrugged: Ayn Rand Against American Conservatism and Libertarianism

Dean Caivano
{"title":"E pluribus unum Shrugged: Ayn Rand Against American Conservatism and Libertarianism","authors":"Dean Caivano","doi":"10.31014/AIOR.1991.04.02.287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past decade has witnessed a renewed interest in the works of twentieth-century Objectivist philosopher Ayn Rand. Political events ranging from the rise of the Tea Party to the 2016 election of Donald J. Trump have only helped to spur this resurgence, further evident in film adaptations and reissues of her popular literary novels. Political pundits abound have, in turn, deemed the return of Ayn Rand as a victory for libertarian thought and the Republican Party, more broadly. However, in this paper I contest such a theoretical synergy and complicate the Rand/Republican Party interplay by suggesting that it rests on false grounds. Drawing from Rand’s Objectivism, I argue that modern-day Republican Party politics, specifically conservative and libertarian strains of thought, fail on epistemological grounds. The philosophical writings of the Russian-born, turned-American philosopher therefore are not only incompatible, but function as a forceful critique against the governing platform of the Republican Party in preparation for the 2022 midterm elections.","PeriodicalId":422077,"journal":{"name":"Political Anthropology eJournal","volume":"12 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31014/AIOR.1991.04.02.287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a renewed interest in the works of twentieth-century Objectivist philosopher Ayn Rand. Political events ranging from the rise of the Tea Party to the 2016 election of Donald J. Trump have only helped to spur this resurgence, further evident in film adaptations and reissues of her popular literary novels. Political pundits abound have, in turn, deemed the return of Ayn Rand as a victory for libertarian thought and the Republican Party, more broadly. However, in this paper I contest such a theoretical synergy and complicate the Rand/Republican Party interplay by suggesting that it rests on false grounds. Drawing from Rand’s Objectivism, I argue that modern-day Republican Party politics, specifically conservative and libertarian strains of thought, fail on epistemological grounds. The philosophical writings of the Russian-born, turned-American philosopher therefore are not only incompatible, but function as a forceful critique against the governing platform of the Republican Party in preparation for the 2022 midterm elections.
合众为一:安·兰德反对美国保守主义和自由意志主义
在过去的十年里,人们对20世纪客观主义哲学家安·兰德(Ayn Rand)的作品重新产生了兴趣。从茶党(Tea Party)的崛起到2016年唐纳德·j·特朗普(Donald J. Trump)的当选,各种政治事件只是帮助刺激了她的复兴,这在她的热门文学小说改编的电影和再版中得到了进一步体现。反过来,很多政治专家认为,安·兰德的回归是自由主义思想和共和党的胜利。然而,在本文中,我对这种理论协同提出了质疑,并通过暗示它建立在错误的基础上,使兰德/共和党的相互作用复杂化。根据兰德的客观主义,我认为现代共和党政治,特别是保守主义和自由意志主义的思想,在认识论的基础上失败了。因此,这位出生于俄罗斯的美国哲学家的哲学著作不仅是不相容的,而且是为2022年中期选举做准备而对共和党执政纲领的有力批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信