Skin Testing for IgE Mediated Disease can be Done Safely in The Family Practice Office

Larry M. Garner, Andrew R. Naples, M. Ebeling, T. Hulsey, F. Schaffer
{"title":"Skin Testing for IgE Mediated Disease can be Done Safely in The Family Practice Office","authors":"Larry M. Garner, Andrew R. Naples, M. Ebeling, T. Hulsey, F. Schaffer","doi":"10.4172/2327-4972.1000164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Aeroallergen skin testing for assessing allergic disease has been in use for well over 100 years. Initially, trepidation to the use of skin puncture testing (SPT) occurred because of reported morbidity and mortality. SPT has most frequently been utilized in the specialist office due to fear of adverse reactions. \nMethods: Analysis of 156,335 SPT tests (morbidity and mortality) allowed equivalency testing versus superiority testing to show 95% confidence level. The ninety-five percent confidence interval around the 11.5/100,000 SPT is (11.3-11.7/100,000). \nResults: The literature documents 1 death from SPT from 1990 to 2001 and 1 death from 1945 to 1987. These 2 reported deaths have been contrasted with 0 deaths in 125,295 SPT patients reviewed in a primary care setting utilizing United Allergy Service protocols (UAS). Systemic reactions (SR) occurred in only 18 patients. The SR rate amongst subspecialists has been reported as a 0.015-0.023% SR per 100,000 SPT. Statistically, this result is not significantly different from the UAS SR rate of 0.0115% without associated anaphylaxis or deaths. \nConclusion: Based on the findings evident in this study, SPT is safely performed in the primary care (PC) office and allows for a larger percentage of the symptomatic population to be assessed. The observed SR rate of 11.5/100,000 SPT was statistically similar to the lowest published rate of 15/100,000 SPT (p=0.45) and statistically lower than the highest published rate of 23/100,000 SPT (p=0.02). These data suggest that SPT is as safe in the (PC) office as it is in the specialist office.","PeriodicalId":356612,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine and Medical Science Research","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine and Medical Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4972.1000164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Aeroallergen skin testing for assessing allergic disease has been in use for well over 100 years. Initially, trepidation to the use of skin puncture testing (SPT) occurred because of reported morbidity and mortality. SPT has most frequently been utilized in the specialist office due to fear of adverse reactions. Methods: Analysis of 156,335 SPT tests (morbidity and mortality) allowed equivalency testing versus superiority testing to show 95% confidence level. The ninety-five percent confidence interval around the 11.5/100,000 SPT is (11.3-11.7/100,000). Results: The literature documents 1 death from SPT from 1990 to 2001 and 1 death from 1945 to 1987. These 2 reported deaths have been contrasted with 0 deaths in 125,295 SPT patients reviewed in a primary care setting utilizing United Allergy Service protocols (UAS). Systemic reactions (SR) occurred in only 18 patients. The SR rate amongst subspecialists has been reported as a 0.015-0.023% SR per 100,000 SPT. Statistically, this result is not significantly different from the UAS SR rate of 0.0115% without associated anaphylaxis or deaths. Conclusion: Based on the findings evident in this study, SPT is safely performed in the primary care (PC) office and allows for a larger percentage of the symptomatic population to be assessed. The observed SR rate of 11.5/100,000 SPT was statistically similar to the lowest published rate of 15/100,000 SPT (p=0.45) and statistically lower than the highest published rate of 23/100,000 SPT (p=0.02). These data suggest that SPT is as safe in the (PC) office as it is in the specialist office.
IgE介导性疾病的皮肤试验可以在家庭诊所安全地进行
背景:空气过敏原皮肤试验用于评估过敏性疾病已经使用了100多年。最初,由于报道的发病率和死亡率,人们对使用皮肤穿刺试验(SPT)感到恐慌。由于担心不良反应,专家办公室最常使用小组治疗。方法:对156,335例SPT试验(发病率和死亡率)进行分析,允许等效检验与优势检验显示95%的置信度。11.5/100,000 SPT附近的95%置信区间为(11.3-11.7/100,000)。结果:文献记录1990 ~ 2001年SPT死亡1例,1945 ~ 1987年SPT死亡1例。这2例报告的死亡与在初级保健机构使用联合过敏服务协议(UAS)审查的125,295例SPT患者的0例死亡进行了对比。仅有18例患者出现全身反应(SR)。据报道,亚专科医生的SR率为0.015-0.023% / 100,000 SPT。统计学上,这一结果与无相关过敏反应或死亡的UAS SR率0.0115%无显著差异。结论:基于本研究的明显发现,SPT在初级保健(PC)办公室是安全的,并且允许对更大比例的有症状人群进行评估。观察到的SR率为11.5/100,000 SPT,与最低发表率15/100,000 SPT有统计学意义相似(p=0.45),低于最高发表率23/100,000 SPT (p=0.02)。这些数据表明,SPT在(PC)办公室和在专家办公室一样安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信