A Comparison of the state-favored religions in Turkey and Hungary

F. Yılmaz, A. Máté-Tóth
{"title":"A Comparison of the state-favored religions in Turkey and Hungary","authors":"F. Yılmaz, A. Máté-Tóth","doi":"10.20413/rascee.2022.15.1.37-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible to establish a radical separation between religion and politics in constitutionally secular states? Is religion a private or political matter? In many countries, religious people are becoming activists, involving politics, trying to change the policies based on their beliefs or get a share of the state power. Their claims sometimes fall within the democratic structure of the country, and sometimes outside of it. This paper provides insight into the relation between state and religion by focusing on the religious politics of two countries, Turkey and Hungary This study is, in essence, a crossregional and cross-religious comparative study, presenting the very first comparison of the state-religion relationships in the two countries. Ninian Smart’s concept of dimensions of religion will be used as a framework to extract a pattern for each country. These dimensions exist in social systems and reflect the cultural and social milieu in which people socialize and build their own beliefs. Our goal is to present and prove that the religious features of Turkey and Hungary are comparable and show similarities along each dimension of Smart. Exploratory qualitative analysis will be employed to collect and analyze qualitative data in order to generate new concepts and generalizations. The data will be collected from open sources, such as newspapers, statistics, and survey results in Hungary and Turkey, to find the answer to the research questions. The main results of our comparative analysis are, first, evidence for substantial similarities regarding the presence of religion in the public sphere in each Smartian dimension, although in countries that are very different in terms of religion. Second, our systematic and structured analysis provides a strong and impartial invitation for further comparative research from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. This study is going to provide data collected from open sources such as newspapers, statistics, survey results in Hungary and Turkey, in order to find the reply to these questions.","PeriodicalId":161644,"journal":{"name":"Religion and society in Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and society in Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20413/rascee.2022.15.1.37-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is it possible to establish a radical separation between religion and politics in constitutionally secular states? Is religion a private or political matter? In many countries, religious people are becoming activists, involving politics, trying to change the policies based on their beliefs or get a share of the state power. Their claims sometimes fall within the democratic structure of the country, and sometimes outside of it. This paper provides insight into the relation between state and religion by focusing on the religious politics of two countries, Turkey and Hungary This study is, in essence, a crossregional and cross-religious comparative study, presenting the very first comparison of the state-religion relationships in the two countries. Ninian Smart’s concept of dimensions of religion will be used as a framework to extract a pattern for each country. These dimensions exist in social systems and reflect the cultural and social milieu in which people socialize and build their own beliefs. Our goal is to present and prove that the religious features of Turkey and Hungary are comparable and show similarities along each dimension of Smart. Exploratory qualitative analysis will be employed to collect and analyze qualitative data in order to generate new concepts and generalizations. The data will be collected from open sources, such as newspapers, statistics, and survey results in Hungary and Turkey, to find the answer to the research questions. The main results of our comparative analysis are, first, evidence for substantial similarities regarding the presence of religion in the public sphere in each Smartian dimension, although in countries that are very different in terms of religion. Second, our systematic and structured analysis provides a strong and impartial invitation for further comparative research from both qualitative and quantitative perspectives. This study is going to provide data collected from open sources such as newspapers, statistics, survey results in Hungary and Turkey, in order to find the reply to these questions.
土耳其和匈牙利政府支持的宗教比较
在宪法世俗的国家里,是否有可能在宗教和政治之间建立一种彻底的分离?宗教是私人问题还是政治问题?在许多国家,宗教人士正在成为积极分子,参与政治,试图根据他们的信仰改变政策或分享国家权力。他们的要求有时在国家的民主结构之内,有时在它之外。本文以土耳其和匈牙利两国的宗教政治为研究对象,深入探讨了国家与宗教的关系。从本质上讲,这项研究是一项跨地区、跨宗教的比较研究,首次对两国的国家与宗教关系进行了比较。尼尼安·斯玛特的宗教维度概念将作为一个框架来提取每个国家的模式。这些维度存在于社会系统中,反映了人们社交和建立自己信仰的文化和社会环境。我们的目标是展示并证明土耳其和匈牙利的宗教特征具有可比性,并在Smart的每个维度上显示相似性。探索性定性分析将用于收集和分析定性数据,以产生新的概念和概括。数据将从匈牙利和土耳其的报纸、统计数据和调查结果等公开来源收集,以找到研究问题的答案。我们比较分析的主要结果是,首先,证据表明,尽管在宗教信仰方面存在很大差异的国家,但在每个Smartian维度的公共领域中,宗教存在着实质性的相似性。其次,我们系统和结构化的分析为进一步从定性和定量角度进行比较研究提供了强有力和公正的邀请。这项研究将提供从匈牙利和土耳其的报纸、统计数据、调查结果等公开来源收集的数据,以找到这些问题的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信