ANALYTICAL TOOLKIT FOR MENTORING ACTIVITIES IN ENTERPRISES

Kateryna Dorohkevych, Orest Sydorak, R. Dzvonyk
{"title":"ANALYTICAL TOOLKIT FOR MENTORING ACTIVITIES IN ENTERPRISES","authors":"Kateryna Dorohkevych, Orest Sydorak, R. Dzvonyk","doi":"10.25264/2311-5149-2023-28(56)-25-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the theoretical foundations of mentoring as a system of relationships in which one person (mentor) provides support for new knowledge, development and progress of another person (student, mentee). A study of legislative and institutional support, as well as the results of practical implementation of mentoring as a form of professional socialization at enterprises (MTS Ukraine, Coca-Cola Beverages Ukraine, 3M Ukraine, KPMG in Ukraine, JSC Ukrzaliznytsia, etc.) was conducted. Positive results of mentoring determined the increase in the level of internal system of training of employees, the development of own know-how of enterprises, increasing the level of satisfaction of employees with work, the formation of high-quality intellectual and human resources potential to ensure digital transformations at enterprises, the elimination of conflicts, increasing the level of motivation, the introduction of new rules and traditions of the company, increasing the level of relevance and reliability of Management Information, expanding the network of international contacts between employees (exchange of experience, solutions and ideas), improving the skills of employees and their performance, etc. The disadvantages of implementing mentoring systems of enterprises include resistance from mentors and their unwillingness to share experience with young colleagues, as well as the spread of mentoring practices only for new employees of enterprises, young specialists, beginners in a particular profession, undeveloped feedback between mentor and mentee (mutual mentoring). Using the method of theoretical generalization, analysis and synthesis, the article examines the analytical tools of mentoring activities, which are summarized in four groups: a targeted questionnaire survey of respondents, an online survey in the internet environment, a critical analysis of literature sources and the regulatory framework for the problem, a combination of various methods (questionnaire surveys, interviews, demonstration projects, etc.). In the context of deepening the practice of combining various methods of analysis, in order to increase the effectiveness of mentoring activities, when implementing analytical work, it is recommended to use methods of personnel assessment: 365 degrees method, Hay method, point-factor assessment, assessment center. The article outlines the essence of the recommended methods and points out the advantages of using them when analyzing mentoring systems in enterprises.","PeriodicalId":254090,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, \"Economics\" Series","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, \"Economics\" Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2023-28(56)-25-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the theoretical foundations of mentoring as a system of relationships in which one person (mentor) provides support for new knowledge, development and progress of another person (student, mentee). A study of legislative and institutional support, as well as the results of practical implementation of mentoring as a form of professional socialization at enterprises (MTS Ukraine, Coca-Cola Beverages Ukraine, 3M Ukraine, KPMG in Ukraine, JSC Ukrzaliznytsia, etc.) was conducted. Positive results of mentoring determined the increase in the level of internal system of training of employees, the development of own know-how of enterprises, increasing the level of satisfaction of employees with work, the formation of high-quality intellectual and human resources potential to ensure digital transformations at enterprises, the elimination of conflicts, increasing the level of motivation, the introduction of new rules and traditions of the company, increasing the level of relevance and reliability of Management Information, expanding the network of international contacts between employees (exchange of experience, solutions and ideas), improving the skills of employees and their performance, etc. The disadvantages of implementing mentoring systems of enterprises include resistance from mentors and their unwillingness to share experience with young colleagues, as well as the spread of mentoring practices only for new employees of enterprises, young specialists, beginners in a particular profession, undeveloped feedback between mentor and mentee (mutual mentoring). Using the method of theoretical generalization, analysis and synthesis, the article examines the analytical tools of mentoring activities, which are summarized in four groups: a targeted questionnaire survey of respondents, an online survey in the internet environment, a critical analysis of literature sources and the regulatory framework for the problem, a combination of various methods (questionnaire surveys, interviews, demonstration projects, etc.). In the context of deepening the practice of combining various methods of analysis, in order to increase the effectiveness of mentoring activities, when implementing analytical work, it is recommended to use methods of personnel assessment: 365 degrees method, Hay method, point-factor assessment, assessment center. The article outlines the essence of the recommended methods and points out the advantages of using them when analyzing mentoring systems in enterprises.
用于企业中指导活动的分析工具包
本文考察了师徒关系系统的理论基础,其中一个人(导师)为另一个人(学生、被指导者)的新知识、发展和进步提供支持。研究了立法和制度支持,以及在企业(乌克兰MTS、乌克兰可口可乐饮料、乌克兰3M、乌克兰毕马威、乌克兰JSC Ukrzaliznytsia等)中实际实施指导作为一种专业社会化形式的结果。指导的积极结果决定了员工培训内部系统水平的提高,企业自身知识的发展,员工对工作的满意度的提高,形成高质量的智力和人力资源潜力,以确保企业的数字化转型,消除冲突,提高激励水平,引入公司的新规则和传统。提高管理信息的相关性和可靠性,扩大员工之间的国际联系网络(交流经验、解决方案和想法),提高员工的技能和绩效等。企业实施师徒制度的弊端包括导师的抵制和不愿意与年轻同事分享经验,以及师徒实践仅针对企业新员工、年轻专家、某一专业的初学者传播,师徒之间的反馈不发达(相互指导)。本文采用理论概括、分析和综合的方法,考察了师徒活动的分析工具,将其归纳为四组:针对受访者的针对性问卷调查、网络环境下的在线调查、对文献来源和问题监管框架的批判性分析、多种方法的结合(问卷调查、访谈、示范项目等)。在深入实践多种分析方法相结合的背景下,为提高师徒活动的有效性,在实施分析工作时,建议采用人员考核方法:365度法、Hay法、点因子考核、考核中心考核。本文概述了推荐方法的本质,并指出了在分析企业师徒制度时使用这些方法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信