Curriculum Reform: The Exclusive Advanced Level Divinity vis-a-vis the Inclusive Updated Family and Religious Studies

Francis Machingura, M. Hwaire
{"title":"Curriculum Reform: The Exclusive Advanced Level Divinity vis-a-vis the Inclusive Updated Family and Religious Studies","authors":"Francis Machingura, M. Hwaire","doi":"10.4314/ZJER.V30I3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a phenomenological discourse on the teaching and learning of Family and Religious studies at Advanced Level. It unravels the ontological turn of the teaching and learning of Family and Religious Studies (FRS) at Advanced Level. The recommendations of the 1999 Presidential commission of inquiry into education and training (CIET) called for the reorientation and reorganization of the syllabi content, aims and pedagogical teachings. The thrust of the recommendations was on the introduction of a multi-cultural approach to the teaching of religious studies in schools. This paper is a comparative analysis of the erstwhile exclusive Divinity syllabus aims, objectives, content and teaching methods vis-a-vis the updated multi-faith Family and Religious Syllabus. This comparative analysis helps to identify the shortcomings of the exclusive curriculum and then the reasons why adoption of multiculturalism was long overdue. It is important to note that the subject has a new title, the first time that it has taken a homogeneous title from form one up-to Advanced Level. Various stakeholders were consulted on the ‘inclusive’ updated 2017-2022 broader curriculum. However, focus of the consultations was on multi-cultural Family and Religious Studies curriculum. The qualitative approach was used in the analysis of data. The research was carried out from March 2017 up to September 2017. As a result, six high schools (church and government run schools) from the Harare Metropolitan Province were randomly sampled; one hundred and fifty religious education learners, twenty parents and twenty teachers (inclusive of five retired Divinity teachers interviewed) were given questionnaires. The six school heads, parents, Minister of Primary and Secondary Education, Scripture Union personnel, retired Religious Education teachers and one FRS curriculum developer were interviewed. The study revealed that stakeholders with a Christian background were against the multi-faith curriculum particularly its inclusion of Islam and African indigenous religion. The inclusion of the two religions is metaphorically and negatively perceived as elephants in the living room. The paper recommends wider awareness on the significance of a multi-cultural study of Family and Religious studies.","PeriodicalId":420413,"journal":{"name":"Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ZJER.V30I3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper is a phenomenological discourse on the teaching and learning of Family and Religious studies at Advanced Level. It unravels the ontological turn of the teaching and learning of Family and Religious Studies (FRS) at Advanced Level. The recommendations of the 1999 Presidential commission of inquiry into education and training (CIET) called for the reorientation and reorganization of the syllabi content, aims and pedagogical teachings. The thrust of the recommendations was on the introduction of a multi-cultural approach to the teaching of religious studies in schools. This paper is a comparative analysis of the erstwhile exclusive Divinity syllabus aims, objectives, content and teaching methods vis-a-vis the updated multi-faith Family and Religious Syllabus. This comparative analysis helps to identify the shortcomings of the exclusive curriculum and then the reasons why adoption of multiculturalism was long overdue. It is important to note that the subject has a new title, the first time that it has taken a homogeneous title from form one up-to Advanced Level. Various stakeholders were consulted on the ‘inclusive’ updated 2017-2022 broader curriculum. However, focus of the consultations was on multi-cultural Family and Religious Studies curriculum. The qualitative approach was used in the analysis of data. The research was carried out from March 2017 up to September 2017. As a result, six high schools (church and government run schools) from the Harare Metropolitan Province were randomly sampled; one hundred and fifty religious education learners, twenty parents and twenty teachers (inclusive of five retired Divinity teachers interviewed) were given questionnaires. The six school heads, parents, Minister of Primary and Secondary Education, Scripture Union personnel, retired Religious Education teachers and one FRS curriculum developer were interviewed. The study revealed that stakeholders with a Christian background were against the multi-faith curriculum particularly its inclusion of Islam and African indigenous religion. The inclusion of the two religions is metaphorically and negatively perceived as elephants in the living room. The paper recommends wider awareness on the significance of a multi-cultural study of Family and Religious studies.
课程改革:专上高级水平的神学与包容性更新的家庭与宗教研究
本文是对高等家庭与宗教学的现象学论述。它揭示了高等家庭与宗教研究(FRS)教学的本体论转向。1999年总统教育培训调查委员会(CIET)的建议要求对教学大纲内容、目标和教学教学进行重新定位和重组。这些建议的重点是在学校的宗教研究教学中采用多元文化的方法。本文对原有的《神学课程大纲》的宗旨、目标、内容和教学方法与新修订的《家庭与宗教课程大纲》进行了比较分析。这种比较分析有助于找出排他性课程的缺点,然后找出多元文化主义姗姗来迟的原因。值得注意的是,该主题有一个新的标题,这是它第一次从一级到高级级别使用同质标题。就2017-2022年更新的“包容性”更广泛的课程咨询了各种利益相关者。不过,协商的重点是多文化家庭和宗教研究课程。数据分析采用定性方法。该研究于2017年3月至2017年9月进行。结果,哈拉雷都会省的六所高中(教会和政府开办的学校)被随机抽样;150名宗教教育学生、20名家长和20名教师(包括5名退休的神学教师)接受了问卷调查。采访了六所学校的校长、家长、中小学教育部长、圣经联盟的工作人员、退休的宗教教育教师和一名FRS课程开发人员。该研究显示,具有基督教背景的利益相关者反对多信仰课程,特别是将伊斯兰教和非洲土著宗教纳入其中。这两种宗教的融合被比喻为客厅里的大象。本文建议对家庭和宗教研究的多元文化研究的意义有更广泛的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信