Le Silence des Agneaux: France’s War Against ‘Jihadist Groups’ and Associated Legal Rationale

Rebecca Mignot-Mahdavi
{"title":"Le Silence des Agneaux: France’s War Against ‘Jihadist Groups’ and Associated Legal Rationale","authors":"Rebecca Mignot-Mahdavi","doi":"10.19165/2020.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Silence is deceitful. While France has not publicly articulated a legal framework for its war on terror, its silence should not be taken for the absence of a well-defined military strategy and corresponding legal rationale. While the geographical and temporal scope of the United States’ war on terror has been highly debated from a legal point of view and led the US to develop extensive interpretations of the laws regulating the use of force, France’s military strategy remains largely underexplored by lawyers. This contribution brings to light that France frames its involvement in foreign territories as part of a unique war against jihadist groups, going a step further to the US’ war against “Al-Qaeda and associated forces”. Because France claims to fight against terrorism in the respect of international law, but without providing its interpretation of it in detail, identifying its military strategy allows me to determine what legal interpretations such strategy implies to embrace. These interpretations are much closer to the US’ than anyone would admit. The paper outlines the relevant legal standards applicable to the situations of use of force against terrorist groups and focuses on France, in an attempt to force the conversation on what it has been doing in the Sahel region, and following which legal interpretations of the norms regulating the use of force\"","PeriodicalId":169248,"journal":{"name":"ICCT Research Paper","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICCT Research Paper","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19165/2020.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

"Silence is deceitful. While France has not publicly articulated a legal framework for its war on terror, its silence should not be taken for the absence of a well-defined military strategy and corresponding legal rationale. While the geographical and temporal scope of the United States’ war on terror has been highly debated from a legal point of view and led the US to develop extensive interpretations of the laws regulating the use of force, France’s military strategy remains largely underexplored by lawyers. This contribution brings to light that France frames its involvement in foreign territories as part of a unique war against jihadist groups, going a step further to the US’ war against “Al-Qaeda and associated forces”. Because France claims to fight against terrorism in the respect of international law, but without providing its interpretation of it in detail, identifying its military strategy allows me to determine what legal interpretations such strategy implies to embrace. These interpretations are much closer to the US’ than anyone would admit. The paper outlines the relevant legal standards applicable to the situations of use of force against terrorist groups and focuses on France, in an attempt to force the conversation on what it has been doing in the Sahel region, and following which legal interpretations of the norms regulating the use of force"
《沉默的战争:法国对“圣战组织”的战争和相关的法律依据
“沉默是骗人的。虽然法国没有公开阐明其反恐战争的法律框架,但它的沉默不应被视为缺乏明确的军事战略和相应的法律依据。虽然从法律角度来看,美国反恐战争的地理和时间范围一直备受争议,并导致美国对规范使用武力的法律进行了广泛的解释,但法国的军事战略在很大程度上仍未得到律师的充分探讨。这一贡献揭示出,法国将其在外国领土的参与,定义为一场针对圣战组织的独特战争的一部分,比美国针对“基地组织(Al-Qaeda)及相关势力”的战争更进一步。由于法国声称在国际法方面打击恐怖主义,但没有提供其对国际法的详细解释,确定其军事战略使我能够确定这种战略意味着接受何种法律解释。这些解读比任何人都愿意承认的更接近美国的解读。该文件概述了适用于对恐怖组织使用武力的情况的相关法律标准,并以法国为重点,试图迫使对话讨论它在萨赫勒地区所做的事情,以及对规范使用武力的规范的法律解释。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信