Platform, Meet Apps: Pricing and Quality Under Cross-Sided Externalities

Raymond G. Sin, Jia Jia
{"title":"Platform, Meet Apps: Pricing and Quality Under Cross-Sided Externalities","authors":"Raymond G. Sin, Jia Jia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2044551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our study is motivated by the observation that two-sided platforms often exercise control on access to and transactions on at least one side of the market. For example, Apple's rigorous approval process and recent policies that prohibit cross-platform app-building tools is an indication of imposing control on both access and quality of its app market. Extant literature on two-sided markets fails to accommodate platform’s interventions on participation by either side (i.e. consumers and sellers of complementary products) of the market because it typically focuses on a homogeneous population. Our work aims to bridge this gap and provides the underlying rationale for the platform firm’s governance structure and optimal pricing decisions.","PeriodicalId":201359,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Microeconometric Models of Firm Behavior eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Microeconometric Models of Firm Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2044551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study is motivated by the observation that two-sided platforms often exercise control on access to and transactions on at least one side of the market. For example, Apple's rigorous approval process and recent policies that prohibit cross-platform app-building tools is an indication of imposing control on both access and quality of its app market. Extant literature on two-sided markets fails to accommodate platform’s interventions on participation by either side (i.e. consumers and sellers of complementary products) of the market because it typically focuses on a homogeneous population. Our work aims to bridge this gap and provides the underlying rationale for the platform firm’s governance structure and optimal pricing decisions.
平台与应用:横向外部性下的定价与质量
我们研究的动机是观察到,双边平台通常对市场的至少一方的准入和交易进行控制。例如,苹果严格的审批程序和最近禁止跨平台应用构建工具的政策表明,它对应用市场的访问和质量都施加了控制。现有的关于双边市场的文献没有考虑到平台对市场任何一方(即互补产品的消费者和卖家)参与的干预,因为它通常关注的是同质人群。我们的工作旨在弥合这一差距,并为平台公司的治理结构和最优定价决策提供基本原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信