SERGEY EFRON TO LEV KARSAVIN: “BUT YOUR PLACE IS EMPTY!”. LETTERS OF THE “LEFT” EURASIANS TO L.P. KARSAVIN AS A CHRONICLE OF THE KLAMARSKY SPLIT

K. B. Ermishina, V. I. Sharonov
{"title":"SERGEY EFRON TO LEV KARSAVIN: “BUT YOUR PLACE IS EMPTY!”. LETTERS OF THE “LEFT” EURASIANS TO L.P. KARSAVIN AS A CHRONICLE OF THE KLAMARSKY SPLIT","authors":"K. B. Ermishina, V. I. Sharonov","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2023-2-10-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preface and the documents presented are about the split of the Eurasian movement in the late 1920s. For the first time archival materials are being introduced into scientific circulation, revealing the details of the split into two opposing groups of Eurasians. The first group operated in Prague, its leader was P.N. Savitsky. They defended an apolitical, anti-communist, anti-Marxist position, continued to develop the traditions of classical Eurasianism. The second group under the leadership of P.P. Suvchinsky was formed in Paris, it is considered responsible for the politicization of the movement, Marxist and Sovietophile sentiments. Such a scheme has become familiar, but the published documents introduce new adjustments and details important for the history of Russian thought. The publication and scientific comments reveal the role of the organization “Trust” (OGPU) in the split, the composition of the authors of the newspaper “Eurasia” and its thematic focus. The positions of the parties are clarified, and the question of the ideological side of the Eurasian split of 1928–1929 is raised.","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2023-2-10-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The preface and the documents presented are about the split of the Eurasian movement in the late 1920s. For the first time archival materials are being introduced into scientific circulation, revealing the details of the split into two opposing groups of Eurasians. The first group operated in Prague, its leader was P.N. Savitsky. They defended an apolitical, anti-communist, anti-Marxist position, continued to develop the traditions of classical Eurasianism. The second group under the leadership of P.P. Suvchinsky was formed in Paris, it is considered responsible for the politicization of the movement, Marxist and Sovietophile sentiments. Such a scheme has become familiar, but the published documents introduce new adjustments and details important for the history of Russian thought. The publication and scientific comments reveal the role of the organization “Trust” (OGPU) in the split, the composition of the authors of the newspaper “Eurasia” and its thematic focus. The positions of the parties are clarified, and the question of the ideological side of the Eurasian split of 1928–1929 is raised.
谢尔盖·埃夫隆对列夫·卡尔萨文说:“但是你的位置是空的!”“左派”欧亚人的信件给l.p. karsavin作为克拉马尔斯基分裂的编年史
前言和所提供的文献是关于20世纪20年代末欧亚运动的分裂。档案材料首次被引入科学流通,揭示了欧亚人分裂成两个对立群体的细节。第一个组织在布拉格运作,其领导人是P.N.萨维茨基。他们捍卫一种非政治的、反共的、反马克思主义的立场,继续发展古典欧亚主义的传统。在P.P. Suvchinsky领导下的第二个团体在巴黎成立,它被认为对运动、马克思主义和亲苏情绪的政治化负有责任。这样的方案已为人们所熟悉,但出版的文件引入了新的调整和对俄罗斯思想史很重要的细节。该出版物和科学评论揭示了“信任”组织(OGPU)在分裂中的作用,“欧亚”报纸作者的组成及其主题重点。澄清了各方的立场,提出了1928-1929年欧亚分裂的意识形态方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信