Debt Structure and Debt Overhang

Liu Gan, Xin Xia, Hai Zhang
{"title":"Debt Structure and Debt Overhang","authors":"Liu Gan, Xin Xia, Hai Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the impact of the optimal debt and priority structure on corporate financing and investment decisions in a dynamic trade-off model, where a firm simultaneously issues bank and market debt. Private bank debt is renegotiable during financial distress; thus it avoids inefficient and costly bankruptcy losses. Our model shows that the debt priority structure between bank and market debt has significant implications on ex post corporate policies, market leverage and firm valuation. Bank debt substitutes market debt in most cases except when firms face a low tax rate environment. Further, firms with stronger bargaining power, more valuable growth opportunities, or higher renegotiation frictions, facing lower cash flow risks, larger bankruptcy costs, or operating in a higher tax rate environment tend to rely more on market debt. We also demonstrate that the issuance of bank debt along with market debt mitigates the ex post debt overhang compared to the exclusive market debt structure, the effect of which is much stronger when the firm faces less renegotiation friction, lower bankruptcy costs, or higher corporate tax rate. These model predictions reconcile several empirical findings and generate a rich set of novel empirical tests.","PeriodicalId":201359,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Microeconometric Models of Firm Behavior eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Microeconometric Models of Firm Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We study the impact of the optimal debt and priority structure on corporate financing and investment decisions in a dynamic trade-off model, where a firm simultaneously issues bank and market debt. Private bank debt is renegotiable during financial distress; thus it avoids inefficient and costly bankruptcy losses. Our model shows that the debt priority structure between bank and market debt has significant implications on ex post corporate policies, market leverage and firm valuation. Bank debt substitutes market debt in most cases except when firms face a low tax rate environment. Further, firms with stronger bargaining power, more valuable growth opportunities, or higher renegotiation frictions, facing lower cash flow risks, larger bankruptcy costs, or operating in a higher tax rate environment tend to rely more on market debt. We also demonstrate that the issuance of bank debt along with market debt mitigates the ex post debt overhang compared to the exclusive market debt structure, the effect of which is much stronger when the firm faces less renegotiation friction, lower bankruptcy costs, or higher corporate tax rate. These model predictions reconcile several empirical findings and generate a rich set of novel empirical tests.
债务结构和债务积压
在企业同时发行银行和市场债券的动态权衡模型中,研究了最优债务和优先级结构对企业融资和投资决策的影响。在金融危机期间,私人银行债务可以重新协商;因此,它避免了低效和昂贵的破产损失。我们的模型表明,银行债务和市场债务之间的债务优先结构对事后公司政策、市场杠杆和公司估值有显著影响。在大多数情况下,银行债务替代市场债务,除非企业面临低税率环境。此外,议价能力更强、增长机会更有价值或重新谈判摩擦更高、现金流风险更低、破产成本更高或在高税率环境下运营的企业往往更依赖市场债务。我们还证明,与独家市场债务结构相比,银行债务和市场债务的发行减轻了事后债务积压,当公司面临较少的重新谈判摩擦,较低的破产成本或较高的公司税率时,其效果要强得多。这些模型预测调和了几个实证发现,并产生了一套丰富的新的实证检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信